THMZvsGLOFETF Comparison
VS
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. THMZ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, GLOF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. THMZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.2% for GLOF. THMZ is up 6.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. GLOF performs better with 16.14% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of THMZ and GLOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
THMZ vs GLOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | THMZ GLOF | +1.65%+1.64% | +2.88%+1.96% | +6.46%+16.14% | +14.42%+24.36% | n/a+81.17% | n/a+74.72% |
| Flows | THMZ GLOF | -$28K-$9M | +$8K-$3M | +$6M+$33M | +$13M+$28M | -+$14M | -+$5M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | THMZ GLOF | +16.03%+14.18% | +15.39%+13.27% | n/a+13.98% | n/a+15.39% |
| Max drawdown | THMZ GLOF | -5.19%-4.75% | -15.58%-9.06% | n/a-16.08% | n/a-24.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | THMZ GLOF | 29d59d | 133d47d | n/a85d | n/a708d |
Trading data
THMZ | GLOF | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.29 | $61.10 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $34.12 | $60.75 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
THMZ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexTHMZ | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
THMZ | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.29 | $61.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | +0.58% |
| AuM | $55.31 M | $212.82 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
THMZ | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Lazard Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | STOXX Global Equity Factor |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 646 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 4, 2025 | April 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
THMZ
USA
53.33%
Japan
10.49%
Other
36.18%
GLOF
USA
58.29%
Other
41.71%
Sectors
THMZ
Technology
38.43%
Industrials
18.3%
Finance
17.64%
Healthcare
11.48%
Other
14.15%
GLOF
Technology
35.89%
Finance
18.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.39%
Healthcare
8.95%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
19.84%
Diversification
THMZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.72%
GLOF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
THMZ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.91%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.46%
Microsoft Corp.
3.38%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
2.74%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.72%
FANUC Corp.
2.41%
Siemens AG
2.35%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
2.32%
Broadcom Inc.
2.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.21%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.13%
Apple, Inc.
2.00%
Schneider Electric SE
1.99%
GLOF
Apple, Inc.
4.75%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.37%
Microsoft Corp.
3.19%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.08%
Broadcom Inc.
1.87%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.05%
Novartis AG
1.03%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.97%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.84%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.82%
Johnson & Johnson
0.75%
AbbVie, Inc.
0.73%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
0.69%
Frequently asked questions about THMZ and GLOF
How have the THMZ and GLOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, THMZ is up 6.46% year-to-date (YTD), while GLOF has returned 16.14%. That puts GLOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: THMZ or GLOF?
Year-to-date, the THMZ ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$33M for GLOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: THMZ or GLOF?
Over the past year, THMZ had a volatility of 15.39%, while GLOF experienced 13.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: THMZ or GLOF?
As of August 31, 2026, THMZ holds $55.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLOF manages $212.82 M.
What sectors do the THMZ and GLOF ETFs invest in?
THMZ leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, GLOF focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the THMZ ETF and GLOF ETF?
THMZ top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Amazon.com, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. GLOF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: THMZ or GLOF?
THMZ holds 60 securities with 42.72% of its assets in the top 15. GLOF has 662 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.9%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
