TBLUvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
Tortoise Global Water ETF (TBLU) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. TBLU's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. TBLU is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for CGW. TBLU is up 1.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. CGW performs better with 2.83% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TBLU and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TBLU vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TBLU CGW | +0.62%+1.17% | -2.32%-1.74% | +1.01%+2.83% | -1.97%+5.61% | +28.14%+29.22% | +21.43%+26.17% |
| Flows | TBLU CGW | +$3M+$10M | +$3M-$111M | +$3M+$41M | +$3M+$26M | -$4M-$160M | +$4M-$102M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TBLU CGW | +14.65%+14.40% | +13.61%+13.15% | +13.95%+13.75% | +15.91%+15.72% |
| Max drawdown | TBLU CGW | -7.33%-6.57% | -12.75%-10.52% | -15.04%-15.88% | -34.73%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | TBLU CGW | 81d80d | 145d148d | 140d140d | 867d862d |
Trading data
TBLU | CGW | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.65 | |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $64.67 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TBLU | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TBLU | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $64.65 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.03% |
| AuM | $56.57 M | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
TBLU | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Tortoise Capital | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Tortoise Global Water Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 67 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 15, 2017 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TBLU
USA
57.52%
United Kingdom
10.54%
Switzerland
9%
France
7.28%
Other
15.66%
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
Sectors
TBLU
Industrials
46.68%
Utilities
24.2%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.35%
Business Services
7.78%
Other
4.99%
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
TBLU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.15%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
TBLU
Ecolab, Inc.
7.80%
Xylem, Inc.
7.68%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.42%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
7.30%
Veolia Environnement SA
7.28%
Veralto Corp.
4.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
4.07%
Geberit AG
4.01%
IDEX Corp.
3.99%
United Utilities Group Plc
3.72%
BELIMO Holding AG
3.65%
Severn Trent Plc
3.44%
Stantec, Inc.
2.63%
Pentair plc
2.09%
Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
1.98%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
Frequently asked questions about TBLU and CGW
How have the TBLU and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, TBLU is up 1.01% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.83%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TBLU or CGW?
Year-to-date, the TBLU ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: TBLU or CGW?
Over the past year, TBLU had a volatility of 13.61%, while CGW experienced 13.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: TBLU or CGW?
As of July 24, 2026, TBLU holds $56.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the TBLU and CGW ETFs invest in?
TBLU leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the TBLU ETF and CGW ETF?
TBLU top holdings include Ecolab, Inc., Xylem, Inc. and American Water Works Co., Inc.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: TBLU or CGW?
TBLU holds 58 securities with 71.15% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 67 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.66%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TBLU & CGW
Advertisement
