Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SUSAvsRECSETF Comparison
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. SUSA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.15% for RECS. SUSA is down -3.32% year-to-date (YTD) with -$99M in YTD flows. RECS performs better with -1.84% YTD performance, and +$282M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SUSA and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SUSA vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SUSA RECS | -3.02%-2.94% | -3.35%-2.73% | -3.32%-1.84% | +18.36%+22.98% | +68.73%+82.47% | +65.27%+95.09% |
| Flows | SUSA RECS | -$21M+$174M | -$57M+$487M | -$99M+$282M | -$474M+$2.28B | -$1.36B+$4.23B | -$1.15B+$4.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SUSA RECS | +13.52%+11.63% | +18.40%+17.97% | +15.02%+14.48% | +17.36%+16.55% |
| Max drawdown | SUSA RECS | -5.67%-3.61% | -13.76%-13.84% | -19.28%-18.49% | -28.25%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | SUSA RECS | 43d30d | 45d45d | 204d126d | 769d573d |
SUSA | RECS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 4:58 PM | $134.31 | $39.35 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $134.73 | $39.47 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SUSA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SUSA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $134.31 | $39.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.30% |
| AuM | $3.54 B | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.15% |
SUSA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Extended ESG Select Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 162 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 24, 2005 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SUSA and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SUSA is down -3.32% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.84%. That puts RECS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SUSA or RECS?
Year-to-date, the SUSA ETF saw -$99M in flows, compared to +$282M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SUSA or RECS?
Over the past year, SUSA had a volatility of 18.4%, while RECS experienced 17.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: SUSA or RECS?
As of March 12, 2026, SUSA holds $3.54 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the SUSA and RECS ETFs invest in?
SUSA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SUSA ETF and RECS ETF?
SUSA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SUSA or RECS?
SUSA holds 175 securities with 37.02% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
