New

Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

SUBvsCGHMETF Comparison

ETF 1
SUB

iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
+0.04%
VS
ETF 2
CGHM

Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
+0.04%

iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. SUB's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, CGHM's top sector exposures are Municipal. SUB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.34% for CGHM. SUB is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.28B in YTD flows. CGHM performs worse with -2.21% YTD performance, and +$1.20B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SUB and CGHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

SUB vs CGHM performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Sep 14Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12

Cumulative Flows

0 M200 M400 M600 M800 M1,000 MSep 14Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/14/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
SUB
CGHM
-0.30%-2.00%
-0.74%-5.13%
+0.35%-2.21%
+0.88%-1.19%
+8.97%n/a
+7.06%n/a
Flows
SUB
CGHM
+$945M+$321M
+$1.28B+$498M
+$2.28B+$1.20B
+$2.62B+$1.42B
+$3.60B-
+$6.46B-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
SUB
CGHM
+1.82%+5.24%
+1.11%+3.56%
+1.16%n/a
+1.21%n/a
Max drawdown
SUB
CGHM
-1.94%-6.50%
-1.94%-6.96%
-1.94%n/a
-3.95%n/a
Max drawdown duration
SUB
CGHM
50d92d
50d108d
50dn/a
772dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
SUB
CGHM
Last sale
10/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
$105.28
$24.43
Previous close
10/14/2026
$104.99
$24.19
Consolidated volume
10/14/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of October 15, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

CGHM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
SUB
CGHM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SUB
CGHM
Last price
$105.28
$24.43
1D performance
+0.28%
+0.99%
AuM$12.49 B$3.52 B
E/R0.07%0.34%
Characteristics
SUB
CGHM
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProvideriSharesCapital Group
BenchmarkICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index-
N° of holdings1169845
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 5, 2008June 25, 2024
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

SUB
USA
46.89%
Other
53.11%
CGHM
USA
45.11%
Other
54.89%

Sectors

SUB
Municipal
46.88%
Other
53.12%
CGHM
Municipal
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Advertisement

Diversification

SUB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

3.97%
CGHM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

7.41%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
SUB
US13063EUS35
0.44%
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023)
0.36%
US64972JWP91
0.33%
New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, FRN 15jun2053, USD (2023)
0.27%
US13063EDB92
0.26%
US89602RPH20
0.25%
Empire State Development Corp., 5% 15sep2028, USD (2022A)
0.25%
US91412HWB58
0.24%
US646140JM63
0.24%
California, 5% 1nov2027, USD
0.23%
California, 5% 1apr2029, USD
0.23%
US812643H643
0.23%
US373385QU02
0.22%
City of New York, FRN 1feb2056, USD (2026)
0.22%
US207758Y563
0.20%
CGHM
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
1.31%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD
0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.61%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
0.53%
US419800PW17
0.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2012A)
0.44%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 4% 1sep2046, USD (2026A)
0.43%
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 5% 1jul2047, USD (2020A)
0.42%
City of New York, FRN 1apr2042, USD
0.35%
Capital Trust Agency, 5% 1jul2056, USD (2021A-1)
0.34%
US83703FLR19
0.33%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2036, USD (2026)
0.33%
US45203HAH57
0.33%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1jun2034, USD (2026)
0.32%
US433675AA39
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about SUB and CGHM

How have the SUB and CGHM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 14, 2026, SUB is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD), while CGHM has lost -2.21%. That puts SUB better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SUB or CGHM?

Year-to-date, the SUB ETF saw +$2.28B in flows, compared to +$1.20B for CGHM.

Which ETF is more volatile: SUB or CGHM?

Over the past year, SUB had a volatility of 1.11%, while CGHM experienced 3.56%.

Which ETF is bigger: SUB or CGHM?

As of October 14, 2026, SUB holds $12.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGHM manages $3.52 B.

What sectors do the SUB and CGHM ETFs invest in?

SUB leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CGHM focuses on Municipal.

What are the top holdings of the SUB ETF and CGHM ETF?

SUB top holdings include US13063EUS35, New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023) and US64972JWP91. CGHM holds in its top three: Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD, Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD and Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD.

Which ETF is more diversified: SUB or CGHM?

SUB holds 2884 securities with 3.97% of its assets in the top 15. CGHM has 2608 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.41%.

Advertisement
Latest news about SUB & CGHM
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026