Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
STXMvsBKMCETF Comparison
Strive Mid-Cap ETF (STXM) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. STXM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, BKMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. STXM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.04% for BKMC. STXM is up 2.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. BKMC performs better with 3.42% YTD performance, and -$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of STXM and BKMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
STXM vs BKMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | STXM BKMC | -4.27%-4.65% | +1.28%+0.71% | +2.62%+3.42% | +21.41%+20.47% | n/a+51.77% | n/a+44.25% |
| Flows | STXM BKMC | -$6M-$26M | -$6M-$33M | -$6M-$40M | -$3M+$24M | -+$46M | -+$401M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | STXM BKMC | +16.16%+14.94% | +21.23%+20.99% | n/a+17.59% | n/a+19.14% |
| Max drawdown | STXM BKMC | -6.67%-5.09% | -15.06%-15.35% | n/a-23.71% | n/a-25.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | STXM BKMC | 14d13d | 46d46d | n/a284d | n/a827d |
STXM | BKMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.23 | $110.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.84 | $112.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
STXM | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
STXM | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.23 | $110.51 |
| 1D performance | -2.04% | -1.85% |
| AuM | $15.79 M | $593.45 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.04% |
STXM | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US 400 Index | Solactive GBS United States 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 357 | 349 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 11, 2024 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the STXM and BKMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, STXM is up 2.62% year-to-date (YTD), while BKMC has returned 3.42%. That puts BKMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: STXM or BKMC?
Year-to-date, the STXM ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$40M for BKMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: STXM or BKMC?
Over the past year, STXM had a volatility of 21.23%, while BKMC experienced 20.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: STXM or BKMC?
As of March 12, 2026, STXM holds $15.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKMC manages $593.45 M.
What sectors do the STXM and BKMC ETFs invest in?
STXM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, BKMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the STXM ETF and BKMC ETF?
STXM top holdings include US80004C2008, BLOOM ENERGY CORP and CIENA. BKMC holds in its top three: US80004C2008, KYG3730V1059 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: STXM or BKMC?
STXM holds 393 securities with 11.34% of its assets in the top 15. BKMC has 396 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.73%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
