Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
STXDvsPFMETF Comparison
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. STXD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, PFM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. STXD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.52% for PFM. STXD is down -2.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. PFM performs better with 0.51% YTD performance, and -$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of STXD and PFM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
STXD vs PFM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | STXD PFM | -4.10%-3.52% | -2.85%-0.04% | -2.59%+0.51% | +13.40%+15.98% | +50.33%+55.00% | n/a+65.72% |
| Flows | STXD PFM | --$6M | +$10M-$15M | +$10M-$23M | +$6M-$39M | +$38M-$180M | --$97M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | STXD PFM | +11.91%+9.48% | +15.93%+14.63% | +12.82%+11.92% | n/a+13.52% |
| Max drawdown | STXD PFM | -5.81%-4.42% | -11.45%-11.22% | -14.68%-14.65% | n/a-17.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | STXD PFM | 59d29d | 46d46d | 238d128d | n/a561d |
STXD | PFM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.05 | $51.72 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.70 | $52.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
STXD | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
STXD | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.05 | $51.72 |
| 1D performance | -1.76% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $59.51 M | $734.81 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.52% |
STXD | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index | NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 195 | 421 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2022 | September 15, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the STXD and PFM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, STXD is down -2.59% year-to-date (YTD), while PFM has returned 0.51%. That puts PFM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: STXD or PFM?
Year-to-date, the STXD ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to -$23M for PFM.
Which ETF is more volatile: STXD or PFM?
Over the past year, STXD had a volatility of 15.93%, while PFM experienced 14.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: STXD or PFM?
As of March 12, 2026, STXD holds $59.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while PFM manages $734.81 M.
What sectors do the STXD and PFM ETFs invest in?
STXD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, PFM focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the STXD ETF and PFM ETF?
STXD top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, BROADCOM LIMITED and LILLY. PFM holds in its top three: LILLY, MICROSOFT-T and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: STXD or PFM?
STXD holds 201 securities with 42.2% of its assets in the top 15. PFM has 426 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.61%.
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
