Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SRHQvsBBMCETF Comparison
SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. SRHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, BBMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. SRHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.07% for BBMC. SRHQ is up 1.15% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. BBMC performs better with 1.29% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SRHQ and BBMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SRHQ vs BBMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SRHQ BBMC | -2.04%-5.79% | +0.22%+0.51% | +1.15%+1.29% | +16.46%+23.60% | +56.05%+55.49% | n/a+29.45% |
| Flows | SRHQ BBMC | --$6M | --$146M | -+$31M | +$1M-$240M | +$22M-$294M | --$282M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SRHQ BBMC | +14.25%+16.13% | +18.33%+21.50% | +15.68%+18.71% | n/a+20.66% |
| Max drawdown | SRHQ BBMC | -4.41%-7.18% | -11.80%-15.74% | -18.39%-24.17% | n/a-30.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | SRHQ BBMC | 15d15d | 46d46d | 303d275d | n/a1045d |
SRHQ | BBMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.05 | $107.89 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.08 | $108.09 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SRHQ | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SRHQ | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.05 | $107.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $176.43 M | $1.86 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.07% |
SRHQ | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SRH Funds | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | SRH U.S. Quality GARP Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 512 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | April 14, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SRHQ and BBMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SRHQ is up 1.15% year-to-date (YTD), while BBMC has returned 1.29%. That puts BBMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SRHQ or BBMC?
Year-to-date, the SRHQ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$31M for BBMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SRHQ or BBMC?
Over the past year, SRHQ had a volatility of 18.33%, while BBMC experienced 21.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: SRHQ or BBMC?
As of March 13, 2026, SRHQ holds $176.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBMC manages $1.86 B.
What sectors do the SRHQ and BBMC ETFs invest in?
SRHQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, BBMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SRHQ ETF and BBMC ETF?
SRHQ top holdings include CIENA, ENERSYS and EMCOR GROUP. BBMC holds in its top three: US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: SRHQ or BBMC?
SRHQ holds 57 securities with 39.11% of its assets in the top 15. BBMC has 564 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
