Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SRHQvsAFMCETF Comparison
SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SRHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, AFMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SRHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.65% for AFMC. SRHQ is up 1.15% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. AFMC performs better with 2.67% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SRHQ and AFMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SRHQ vs AFMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SRHQ AFMC | -2.04%-4.45% | +0.22%+1.14% | +1.15%+2.67% | +16.46%+19.06% | +56.05%+62.84% | n/a+50.27% |
| Flows | SRHQ AFMC | -+$18M | -+$35M | -+$35M | +$1M+$82M | +$22M+$120M | -+$119M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SRHQ AFMC | +14.25%+14.85% | +18.33%+19.50% | +15.68%+17.76% | n/a+19.49% |
| Max drawdown | SRHQ AFMC | -4.41%-6.20% | -11.80%-13.21% | -18.39%-21.83% | n/a-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | SRHQ AFMC | 15d18d | 46d46d | 303d289d | n/a752d |
SRHQ | AFMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.05 | $35.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.08 | $35.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SRHQ | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SRHQ | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.05 | $35.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $176.43 M | $132.52 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.65% |
SRHQ | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SRH Funds | First Trust |
| Benchmark | SRH U.S. Quality GARP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 258 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SRHQ and AFMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SRHQ is up 1.15% year-to-date (YTD), while AFMC has returned 2.67%. That puts AFMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SRHQ or AFMC?
Year-to-date, the SRHQ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$35M for AFMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SRHQ or AFMC?
Over the past year, SRHQ had a volatility of 18.33%, while AFMC experienced 19.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: SRHQ or AFMC?
As of March 13, 2026, SRHQ holds $176.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFMC manages $132.52 M.
What sectors do the SRHQ and AFMC ETFs invest in?
SRHQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, AFMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SRHQ ETF and AFMC ETF?
SRHQ top holdings include CIENA, ENERSYS and EMCOR GROUP. AFMC holds in its top three: MUELLER INDUSTRIES, FEDERATED HERMES and EXELIXIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SRHQ or AFMC?
SRHQ holds 57 securities with 39.11% of its assets in the top 15. AFMC has 265 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.32%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
