SQLVvsFYXETF Comparison
VS
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FYX) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. SQLV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.58% for FYX. SQLV is up 22.71% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. FYX performs worse with 21.16% YTD performance, and +$229M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SQLV and FYX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SQLV vs FYX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SQLV FYX | -0.57%-1.75% | -0.27%-3.94% | +22.71%+21.16% | +26.05%+24.55% | +53.97%+77.93% | +43.24%+52.81% |
| Flows | SQLV FYX | -+$4M | +$11M+$54M | +$11M+$229M | +$7M+$234M | +$2M+$102M | +$14M+$86M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SQLV FYX | +13.76%+12.50% | +15.65%+16.32% | +19.82%+20.48% | +20.96%+21.88% |
| Max drawdown | SQLV FYX | -7.68%-8.70% | -7.68%-8.70% | -26.96%-28.15% | -26.96%-28.15% |
| Max drawdown duration | SQLV FYX | 72d72d | 72d72d | 408d296d | 408d296d |
Trading data
SQLV | FYX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.04 | $134.28 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $52.54 | $135.98 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SQLV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSQLV | FYX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SQLV | FYX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.04 | $134.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.95% | -1.25% |
| AuM | $39.41 M | $1.35 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
SQLV | FYX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index |
| N° of holdings | 318 | 516 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 12, 2017 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SQLV
USA
99.71%
Other
0.29%
FYX
USA
94.66%
Other
5.34%
Sectors
SQLV
Finance
22.2%
Healthcare
18.13%
Technology
15.84%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.7%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.37%
Other
25.77%
FYX
Finance
26.62%
Healthcare
14.81%
Technology
10.25%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.61%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.91%
Energy
7.32%
Other
24.48%
Advertisement
Diversification
SQLV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.14%
FYX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
SQLV
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
Everforth, Inc.
1.09%
Aura Minerals, Inc.
0.92%
DXC Technology Co.
0.91%
H&R Block, Inc.
0.82%
Federated Hermes, Inc.
0.80%
SM Energy Co.
0.78%
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
TriNet Group, Inc.
0.75%
Embecta Corp.
0.75%
Qualys, Inc.
0.72%
Crescent Energy Co.
0.72%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.67%
Five9, Inc.
0.60%
The Western Union Co.
0.60%
FYX
Everforth, Inc.
0.55%
CBIZ, Inc.
0.55%
PBF Energy, Inc.
0.53%
CONMED Corp.
0.48%
Tidewater, Inc.
0.47%
Dorian LPG Ltd.
0.47%
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
0.46%
ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc.
0.45%
International Seaways, Inc.
0.42%
DXC Technology Co.
0.41%
Five9, Inc.
0.41%
Korn Ferry
0.41%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.41%
Acadian Asset Management, Inc.
0.41%
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings, Inc.
0.41%
Frequently asked questions about SQLV and FYX
How have the SQLV and FYX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, SQLV is up 22.71% year-to-date (YTD), while FYX has returned 21.16%. That puts SQLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SQLV or FYX?
Year-to-date, the SQLV ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$229M for FYX.
Which ETF is more volatile: SQLV or FYX?
Over the past year, SQLV had a volatility of 15.65%, while FYX experienced 16.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: SQLV or FYX?
As of October 15, 2026, SQLV holds $39.41 M in assets under management (AUM), while FYX manages $1.35 B.
What sectors do the SQLV and FYX ETFs invest in?
SQLV leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, FYX focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SQLV ETF and FYX ETF?
SQLV top holdings include Victory Capital Holdings, Inc., Everforth, Inc. and Aura Minerals, Inc.. FYX holds in its top three: Everforth, Inc., CBIZ, Inc. and PBF Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SQLV or FYX?
SQLV holds 318 securities with 12.14% of its assets in the top 15. FYX has 516 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
