Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPXNvsUSSGETF Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF (USSG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. SPXN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, USSG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. SPXN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.13%, versus 0.09% for USSG. SPXN is down -1.12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$730K in YTD flows. USSG performs worse with -1.79% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPXN and USSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPXN vs USSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPXN USSG | -1.75%-2.63% | -0.76%-1.80% | -1.12%-1.79% | +23.75%+25.83% | +84.03%+85.32% | +86.58%+85.11% |
| Flows | SPXN USSG | -$730K-$2M | +$740K+$43M | -$730K-$2M | -$1M-$99M | +$30M-$3.20B | +$34M-$3.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPXN USSG | +12.15%+12.33% | +18.80%+18.28% | +15.37%+15.50% | +17.25%+17.32% |
| Max drawdown | SPXN USSG | -3.85%-5.25% | -13.92%-13.43% | -19.44%-20.08% | -24.54%-26.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPXN USSG | 43d42d | 45d45d | 126d154d | 708d713d |
SPXN | USSG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.52 | $61.01 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $72.52 | $61.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPXN | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPXN | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.52 | $61.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $68.66 M | $536.55 M |
| E/R | 0.13% | 0.09% |
SPXN | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Ex-Financials Index | MSCI USA Selection Index |
| N° of holdings | 374 | 380 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2015 | March 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPXN and USSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SPXN is down -1.12% year-to-date (YTD), while USSG has lost -1.79%. That puts SPXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPXN or USSG?
Year-to-date, the SPXN ETF saw -$730K in flows, compared to -$2M for USSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPXN or USSG?
Over the past year, SPXN had a volatility of 18.8%, while USSG experienced 18.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPXN or USSG?
As of March 12, 2026, SPXN holds $68.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while USSG manages $536.55 M.
What sectors do the SPXN and USSG ETFs invest in?
SPXN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, USSG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the SPXN ETF and USSG ETF?
SPXN top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. USSG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPXN or USSG?
SPXN holds 395 securities with 49.65% of its assets in the top 15. USSG has 399 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
