SPXNvsMGCETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF (MGC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. SPXN's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MGC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. SPXN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.13%, versus 0.05% for MGC. SPXN is up 15.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$742K in YTD flows. MGC performs worse with 13.37% YTD performance, and -$668M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPXN and MGC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPXN vs MGC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPXN MGC | +0.02%-0.07% | +6.77%+6.66% | +15.14%+13.37% | +13.60%+12.55% | +93.80%+96.90% | +85.04%+84.33% |
| Flows | SPXN MGC | -+$15M | -$12K-$42M | -$742K-$668M | +$1M+$151M | -$1M+$2.02B | +$33M+$2.09B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPXN MGC | +11.78%+11.52% | +13.79%+13.40% | +15.69%+15.45% | +17.53%+17.49% |
| Max drawdown | SPXN MGC | -3.35%-3.02% | -9.16%-9.86% | -19.44%-19.36% | -24.54%-25.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPXN MGC | 23d23d | 75d92d | 126d126d | 708d707d |
Trading data
SPXN | MGC | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 2:00 PM | $84.41 | $278.72 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $84.96 | $282.45 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPXN | MGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 2:00 PM
Live
Closed
SPXN | MGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.41 | $278.72 |
| 1D performance | -0.64% | -1.32% |
| AuM | $79.42 M | $10.30 B |
| E/R | 0.13% | 0.05% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPXN
USA
34.15%
Other
65.85%
MGC
USA
33.73%
Other
66.27%
Sectors
SPXN
Municipal
12.48%
Finance
9.86%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.07%
Other
68.59%
MGC
Municipal
13.2%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.95%
Finance
8.81%
Other
69.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPXN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.18%
MGC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
SPXN
US677632N648
9.43%
Archer Daniels Midland, 3.75% 15sep2047, USD
8.50%
US60635H2D09
6.41%
American National Group (IA), 5.75% 1oct2029, USD
4.25%
Ambipar Lux, 10.875% 5feb2033, USD
3.48%
US3128M72V78
2.97%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 0% 1jun2057, USD (2020B-3)
2.89%
Ambipar, 9.875% 6feb2031, USD
2.79%
US60636AWS85
2.12%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 0% 15nov2031, USD (2013A, 6864D)
1.85%
Sumisho Air Lease Corp, 3.625% 1dec2027, USD
1.78%
US5444952C72
1.64%
US48936FAG90
1.13%
US463612KA89
1.10%
US956553L337
0.83%
MGC
US677632N648
9.63%
Archer Daniels Midland, 3.75% 15sep2047, USD
8.95%
US60635H2D09
7.01%
American National Group (IA), 5.75% 1oct2029, USD
4.45%
Ambipar Lux, 10.875% 5feb2033, USD
3.72%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 0% 1jun2057, USD (2020B-3)
3.08%
Ambipar, 9.875% 6feb2031, USD
2.95%
US3128M72V78
2.94%
US60636AWS85
2.21%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 0% 15nov2031, USD (2013A, 6864D)
1.84%
Sumisho Air Lease Corp, 3.625% 1dec2027, USD
1.84%
US5444952C72
1.80%
JobsOhio Beverage System, 2.833% 1jan2038, USD (2020A)
1.62%
US09182TGD37
1.58%
US3128LXB909
1.24%
Frequently asked questions about SPXN and MGC
How have the SPXN and MGC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, SPXN is up 15.14% year-to-date (YTD), while MGC has returned 13.37%. That puts SPXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPXN or MGC?
Year-to-date, the SPXN ETF saw -$742K in flows, compared to -$668M for MGC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPXN or MGC?
Over the past year, SPXN had a volatility of 13.79%, while MGC experienced 13.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPXN or MGC?
As of October 29, 2026, SPXN holds $79.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGC manages $10.30 B.
What sectors do the SPXN and MGC ETFs invest in?
SPXN leans toward sectors like Municipal, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, MGC focuses on Municipal, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the SPXN ETF and MGC ETF?
SPXN top holdings include US677632N648, Archer Daniels Midland, 3.75% 15sep2047, USD and US60635H2D09. MGC holds in its top three: US677632N648, Archer Daniels Midland, 3.75% 15sep2047, USD and US60635H2D09.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPXN or MGC?
SPXN holds 392 securities with 51.18% of its assets in the top 15. MGC has 165 securities and a top 15 weight of 54.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SPXN & MGC
Advertisement
