Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPXNvsGSUSETF Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. SPXN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, GSUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SPXN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.13%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. SPXN is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GSUS performs worse with -1.08% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPXN and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPXN vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPXN GSUS | -1.76%-2.09% | -0.50%-1.69% | +0.41%-1.08% | +26.37%+22.50% | +86.87%+84.71% | +89.37%+83.90% |
| Flows | SPXN GSUS | --$543K | +$1M-$15M | --$10M | -$706K+$6M | +$31M+$1.10B | +$35M+$1.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPXN GSUS | +12.03%+11.62% | +18.73%+18.34% | +15.35%+14.95% | +17.24%+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | SPXN GSUS | -3.27%-3.51% | -13.92%-13.91% | -19.44%-19.14% | -24.54%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPXN GSUS | 42d57d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 708d715d |
SPXN | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.25 | $91.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $74.16 | $93.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPXN | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPXN | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.25 | $91.90 |
| 1D performance | -1.22% | -1.52% |
| AuM | $70.46 M | $2.94 B |
| E/R | 0.13% | 0.09% |
SPXN | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Ex-Financials Index | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 374 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2015 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPXN and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SPXN is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.08%. That puts SPXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPXN or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the SPXN ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$10M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPXN or GSUS?
Over the past year, SPXN had a volatility of 18.73%, while GSUS experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPXN or GSUS?
As of March 11, 2026, SPXN holds $70.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.94 B.
What sectors do the SPXN and GSUS ETFs invest in?
SPXN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SPXN ETF and GSUS ETF?
SPXN top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPXN or GSUS?
SPXN holds 395 securities with 49.65% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.