Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPHBvsRDVYETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust NASDAQ Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is part of the US High Dividend segment. SPHB's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, RDVY's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. SPHB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.48% for RDVY. SPHB is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$45M in YTD flows. RDVY performs worse with -1.49% YTD performance, and +$1.06B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPHB and RDVY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPHB vs RDVY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPHB RDVY | -4.12%-4.07% | -1.43%-2.18% | -0.48%-1.49% | +46.01%+19.66% | +81.04%+68.80% | +68.12%+64.38% |
| Flows | SPHB RDVY | -$89M+$291M | +$43M+$1.31B | -$45M+$1.06B | +$150M+$4.20B | -$371M+$7.11B | -$1.32B+$12.81B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPHB RDVY | +24.01%+15.75% | +30.24%+19.35% | +24.72%+17.26% | +27.31%+19.03% |
| Max drawdown | SPHB RDVY | -6.90%-6.59% | -20.30%-13.57% | -29.29%-19.17% | -31.53%-25.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPHB RDVY | 15d42d | 46d45d | 151d219d | 765d708d |
SPHB | RDVY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.39 | $68.22 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $116.34 | $68.43 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPHB | RDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPHB | RDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.39 | $68.22 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $563.18 M | $19.79 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.48% |
SPHB | RDVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 High Beta Index | NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 68 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 5, 2011 | January 6, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPHB and RDVY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SPHB is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD), while RDVY has lost -1.49%. That puts SPHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPHB or RDVY?
Year-to-date, the SPHB ETF saw -$45M in flows, compared to +$1.06B for RDVY.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPHB or RDVY?
Over the past year, SPHB had a volatility of 30.24%, while RDVY experienced 19.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPHB or RDVY?
As of March 12, 2026, SPHB holds $563.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while RDVY manages $19.79 B.
What sectors do the SPHB and RDVY ETFs invest in?
SPHB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, RDVY focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SPHB ETF and RDVY ETF?
SPHB top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY and ALBEMARLE. RDVY holds in its top three: US5128073062, APPLIED MATERIAL and KLA CORPORATION.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPHB or RDVY?
SPHB holds 100 securities with 21.74% of its assets in the top 15. RDVY has 71 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.86%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.