SPHBvsPALCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. SPHB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.6% for PALC. SPHB is up 27.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$151M in YTD flows. PALC performs worse with 10.9% YTD performance, and -$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPHB and PALC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPHB vs PALC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPHB PALC | -0.82%-1.22% | +10.21%+6.49% | +27.84%+10.90% | +46.59%+16.46% | +98.85%+54.26% | +114.56%+53.43% |
| Flows | SPHB PALC | -$51M- | +$16M-$22M | +$151M-$52M | +$218M-$109M | -$67M-$128M | -$1.01B+$36M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPHB PALC | +35.23%+21.65% | +26.63%+14.90% | +26.29%+15.02% | +27.97%+16.80% |
| Max drawdown | SPHB PALC | -14.32%-9.30% | -14.32%-9.30% | -29.29%-17.18% | -31.53%-24.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPHB PALC | 43d35d | 43d35d | 151d327d | 765d809d |
Trading data
SPHB | PALC | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $148.42 | $57.82 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $148.99 | $57.78 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPHB | PALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SPHB | PALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $148.42 | $57.82 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $940.13 M | $219.58 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
SPHB | PALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 High Beta Index | Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 175 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 5, 2011 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPHB
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
PALC
USA
96.26%
Other
3.74%
Sectors
SPHB
Technology
43.5%
Industrials
15.84%
Finance
14.66%
Other
26.01%
PALC
Technology
40.05%
Industrials
14.54%
Finance
10.58%
Healthcare
9.87%
Other
24.96%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPHB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.77%
PALC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.04%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SPHB
Sandisk Corp.
2.65%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.18%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.99%
Lam Research Corp.
1.69%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.62%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
1.60%
Coherent Corp.
1.58%
KLA Corp.
1.56%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.54%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.48%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.45%
Western Digital Corp.
1.43%
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
1.40%
Applovin Corp.
1.30%
Moderna, Inc.
1.30%
PALC
Sandisk Corp.
3.24%
Lam Research Corp.
2.93%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.41%
Visa, Inc.
2.31%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Western Digital Corp.
2.24%
Apple, Inc.
2.16%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.12%
KLA Corp.
2.06%
GE Aerospace
1.85%
Applovin Corp.
1.83%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.81%
Netflix, Inc.
1.73%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.66%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.42%
Frequently asked questions about SPHB and PALC
How have the SPHB and PALC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, SPHB is up 27.84% year-to-date (YTD), while PALC has returned 10.9%. That puts SPHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPHB or PALC?
Year-to-date, the SPHB ETF saw +$151M in flows, compared to -$52M for PALC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPHB or PALC?
Over the past year, SPHB had a volatility of 26.63%, while PALC experienced 14.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPHB or PALC?
As of August 4, 2026, SPHB holds $940.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while PALC manages $219.58 M.
What sectors do the SPHB and PALC ETFs invest in?
SPHB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, PALC focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the SPHB ETF and PALC ETF?
SPHB top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Micron Technology, Inc. and Robinhood Markets, Inc.. PALC holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., Lam Research Corp. and GE Vernova, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SPHB or PALC?
SPHB holds 100 securities with 24.77% of its assets in the top 15. PALC has 175 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.04%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
