Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPDGvsFNDXETF Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. SPDG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, FNDX's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. SPDG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.05%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. SPDG is up 4.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$469K in YTD flows. FNDX performs worse with 3.82% YTD performance, and +$945M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPDG and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPDG vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPDG FNDX | -5.46%-3.23% | +2.28%+2.68% | +4.38%+3.82% | +16.33%+23.39% | n/a+70.48% | n/a+79.58% |
| Flows | SPDG FNDX | -+$389M | -$469K+$1.22B | -$469K+$945M | +$281K+$2.92B | -+$6.36B | -+$10.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPDG FNDX | +11.93%+10.51% | +15.95%+16.43% | n/a+13.43% | n/a+15.36% |
| Max drawdown | SPDG FNDX | -5.46%-3.35% | -11.85%-12.73% | n/a-16.26% | n/a-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPDG FNDX | 28d28d | 50d52d | n/a131d | n/a545d |
SPDG | FNDX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.07 | $27.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $42.57 | $28.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPDG | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPDG | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.07 | $27.92 |
| 1D performance | -1.19% | -1.20% |
| AuM | $11.50 M | $23.90 B |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0.25% |
SPDG | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 281 | 659 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 11, 2023 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPDG and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SPDG is up 4.38% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 3.82%. That puts SPDG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPDG or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the SPDG ETF saw -$469K in flows, compared to +$945M for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPDG or FNDX?
Over the past year, SPDG had a volatility of 15.95%, while FNDX experienced 16.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPDG or FNDX?
As of March 11, 2026, SPDG holds $11.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $23.90 B.
What sectors do the SPDG and FNDX ETFs invest in?
SPDG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the SPDG ETF and FNDX ETF?
SPDG top holdings include CISCO-T, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS and INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. FNDX holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPDG or FNDX?
SPDG holds 283 securities with 48.46% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 691 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.31%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
