SPBWvsBUFTETF Comparison
AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and FT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF (BUFT) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SPBW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.84%, versus 1.21% for BUFT. SPBW is up 6.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. BUFT performs better with 7.14% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPBW and BUFT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPBW vs BUFT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPBW BUFT | +0.79%+0.89% | +1.83%+1.90% | +6.50%+7.14% | +10.20%+9.93% | n/a+31.13% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SPBW BUFT | +$1M+$3M | +$8M+$13M | +$35M+$14M | +$40M+$20M | -+$32M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPBW BUFT | +3.83%+2.51% | +4.14%+3.04% | n/a+5.91% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SPBW BUFT | -1.11%-0.87% | -2.89%-1.83% | n/a-8.01% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SPBW BUFT | 10d12d | 41d9d | n/a79d | n/an/a |
SPBW | BUFT | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.39 | |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $26.40 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SPBW | BUFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.39 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.04% |
| AuM | $86.12 M | $160.78 M |
| E/R | 0.84% | 1.21% |
SPBW | BUFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1 | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 8, 2025 | October 27, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 12 holdings out of 12
Total weight of top 7 holdings out of 7
