Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPAMvsCLOUETF Comparison
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) belongs to the Cybersecurity segment. Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is part of the Cloud Computing segment. SPAM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. In contrast, CLOU's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Real Estate and Communication Services. SPAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.68% for CLOU. SPAM is down -1.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CLOU performs worse with -13.04% YTD performance, and -$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPAM and CLOU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPAM vs CLOU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPAM CLOU | -1.11%+0.12% | -4.92%-12.39% | -1.86%-13.04% | +4.92%-6.76% | n/a+18.82% | n/a-25.07% |
| Flows | SPAM CLOU | --$6M | --$26M | --$23M | +$682K-$92M | --$444M | --$915M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPAM CLOU | +27.39%+28.08% | +24.86%+28.80% | n/a+24.97% | n/a+30.16% |
| Max drawdown | SPAM CLOU | -14.49%-21.72% | -23.70%-25.13% | n/a-31.29% | n/a-53.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPAM CLOU | 45d81d | 155d130d | n/a409d | n/a1590d |
SPAM | CLOU | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.02 | $19.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.79 | $19.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPAM | CLOU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPAM | CLOU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.02 | $19.65 |
| 1D performance | +0.77% | +0.41% |
| AuM | $2.40 M | $210.33 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.68% |
SPAM | CLOU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Global X |
| Benchmark | Solactive Cybersecurity Index | Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 35 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2023 | April 12, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPAM and CLOU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SPAM is down -1.86% year-to-date (YTD), while CLOU has lost -13.04%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPAM or CLOU?
Year-to-date, the SPAM ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$23M for CLOU.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPAM or CLOU?
Over the past year, SPAM had a volatility of 24.86%, while CLOU experienced 28.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPAM or CLOU?
As of March 13, 2026, SPAM holds $2.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLOU manages $210.33 M.
What sectors do the SPAM and CLOU ETFs invest in?
SPAM leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CLOU focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SPAM ETF and CLOU ETF?
SPAM top holdings include AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, CACI INTERNATIONAL and QUALYS. CLOU holds in its top three: AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS INC and DIGITALOCEAN HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPAM or CLOU?
SPAM holds 34 securities with 70.52% of its assets in the top 15. CLOU has 37 securities and a top 15 weight of 62.26%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
