SPAMvsCIBRETF Comparison
VS
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. SPAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.58% for CIBR. SPAM is up 24.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. CIBR performs worse with 18.15% YTD performance, and +$861M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPAM and CIBR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPAM vs CIBR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPAM CIBR | +4.52%+4.22% | +26.11%+29.97% | +24.79%+18.15% | +19.28%+15.61% | n/a+89.04% | n/a+84.29% |
| Flows | SPAM CIBR | +$2M+$728M | +$2M+$876M | +$2M+$861M | +$2M+$2.20B | -+$3.66B | -+$5.15B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPAM CIBR | +34.70%+34.84% | +26.57%+25.09% | n/a+22.64% | n/a+24.96% |
| Max drawdown | SPAM CIBR | -11.27%-11.75% | -23.70%-21.97% | n/a-21.97% | n/a-33.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPAM CIBR | 17d15d | 218d217d | n/a217d | n/a795d |
Trading data
SPAM | CIBR | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.12 | $84.54 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $38.15 | $84.23 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPAM | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SPAM | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.12 | $84.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.37% |
| AuM | $4.57 M | $13.52 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
SPAM | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Solactive Cybersecurity Index | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2023 | June 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPAM
USA
71.45%
Other
28.55%
CIBR
USA
88.59%
Other
11.41%
Sectors
SPAM
Information Techn.
75.35%
Industrials
7.91%
Other
16.74%
CIBR
Information Techn.
85.67%
Other
14.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.98%
CIBR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.28%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
SPAM
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
8.21%
YANDEX
6.89%
US21873S1087
6.61%
NEXTDC
5.65%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
4.95%
FORTINET
4.86%
CLEAR SECURE
4.85%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
4.31%
SENTINELONE
4.30%
CACI INTERNATIONAL
4.06%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING
3.85%
TREND MICRO
3.81%
OKTA
3.68%
FASTLY INC
3.63%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
3.32%
CIBR
BROADCOM LIMITED
9.49%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
8.81%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
8.75%
CISCO-T
8.32%
FORTINET
7.15%
CLOUDFLARE INC
4.54%
ZSCALER INC
3.33%
F5 INC
3.16%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
3.05%
OKTA
2.38%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
2.34%
US0404132054
2.33%
DATADOG
2.26%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.23%
NORTONLIFELOCK INC
2.14%
Frequently asked questions about SPAM and CIBR
How have the SPAM and CIBR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, SPAM is up 24.79% year-to-date (YTD), while CIBR has returned 18.15%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPAM or CIBR?
Year-to-date, the SPAM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$861M for CIBR.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPAM or CIBR?
Over the past year, SPAM had a volatility of 26.57%, while CIBR experienced 25.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPAM or CIBR?
As of June 18, 2026, SPAM holds $4.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while CIBR manages $13.52 B.
What sectors do the SPAM and CIBR ETFs invest in?
SPAM leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CIBR focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SPAM ETF and CIBR ETF?
SPAM top holdings include PALO ALTO NETWORKS, YANDEX and US21873S1087. CIBR holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC and PALO ALTO NETWORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPAM or CIBR?
SPAM holds 34 securities with 72.98% of its assets in the top 15. CIBR has 41 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.28%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SPAM & CIBR
Advertisement
Advertisement
