Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SNPDvsIMCVETF Comparison
Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF (SNPD) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. SNPD's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, IMCV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. SNPD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.06% for IMCV. SNPD is up 6.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$287K in YTD flows. IMCV performs worse with 2.42% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SNPD and IMCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SNPD vs IMCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SNPD IMCV | -4.43%-4.12% | +5.60%+1.73% | +6.26%+2.42% | +11.47%+19.01% | +29.26%+51.20% | n/a+51.04% |
| Flows | SNPD IMCV | +$299K+$27M | +$287K+$47M | +$287K+$40M | -$554K+$231M | -$551K+$252M | -+$314M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SNPD IMCV | +10.78%+11.85% | +14.72%+17.14% | +12.88%+14.66% | n/a+16.70% |
| Max drawdown | SNPD IMCV | -4.98%-5.65% | -11.54%-13.19% | -15.72%-18.64% | n/a-19.72% |
| Max drawdown duration | SNPD IMCV | 10d14d | 89d43d | 442d269d | n/a602d |
SNPD | IMCV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.38 | $84.19 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.52 | $84.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SNPD | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SNPD | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.38 | $84.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $5.13 M | $968.74 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.06% |
SNPD | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Screened Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 256 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 9, 2022 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SNPD and IMCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SNPD is up 6.26% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCV has returned 2.42%. That puts SNPD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SNPD or IMCV?
Year-to-date, the SNPD ETF saw +$287K in flows, compared to +$40M for IMCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: SNPD or IMCV?
Over the past year, SNPD had a volatility of 14.72%, while IMCV experienced 17.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: SNPD or IMCV?
As of March 11, 2026, SNPD holds $5.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCV manages $968.74 M.
What sectors do the SNPD and IMCV ETFs invest in?
SNPD leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, IMCV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the SNPD ETF and IMCV ETF?
SNPD top holdings include FRANKLIN RSC, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS and UGI. IMCV holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, PNC FINL SVC and US.
Which ETF is more diversified: SNPD or IMCV?
SNPD holds 111 securities with 33.01% of its assets in the top 15. IMCV has 275 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.13%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
