Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMOTvsONEOETF Comparison
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. SMOT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.2% for ONEO. SMOT is down -1.78% year-to-date (YTD) with -$19M in YTD flows. ONEO performs better with 4.71% YTD performance, and -$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMOT and ONEO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMOT vs ONEO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMOT ONEO | -4.58%-3.39% | -3.16%+2.90% | -1.78%+4.71% | +8.84%+20.55% | +35.42%+56.04% | n/a+57.80% |
| Flows | SMOT ONEO | -$6M-$1M | -$18M-$74M | -$19M-$26M | -$108M-$74M | +$238M-$247M | --$298M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMOT ONEO | +13.09%+12.93% | +20.93%+17.73% | +17.76%+15.31% | n/a+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | SMOT ONEO | -5.80%-3.92% | -16.08%-12.69% | -23.35%-19.59% | n/a-22.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMOT ONEO | 48d13d | 46d46d | 380d260d | n/a757d |
SMOT | ONEO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.98 | $133.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $35.55 | $135.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMOT | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMOT | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.98 | $133.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.60% | -1.57% |
| AuM | $333.44 M | $25.74 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.2% |
SMOT | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index | Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 102 | 842 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2022 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMOT and ONEO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SMOT is down -1.78% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEO has returned 4.71%. That puts ONEO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMOT or ONEO?
Year-to-date, the SMOT ETF saw -$19M in flows, compared to -$26M for ONEO.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMOT or ONEO?
Over the past year, SMOT had a volatility of 20.93%, while ONEO experienced 17.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMOT or ONEO?
As of March 11, 2026, SMOT holds $333.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEO manages $25.74 M.
What sectors do the SMOT and ONEO ETFs invest in?
SMOT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ONEO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SMOT ETF and ONEO ETF?
SMOT top holdings include ALBEMARLE, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES and SCHLUMBERGER. ONEO holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, MCKESSON and DOLLAR GENERAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMOT or ONEO?
SMOT holds 106 securities with 23.88% of its assets in the top 15. ONEO has 902 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.21%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
