SMOGvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. SMOG's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. SMOG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. SMOG is up 5.31% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs worse with -1.78% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMOG and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMOG vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMOG NUKZ | -1.30%-5.89% | -7.84%-12.64% | +5.31%-1.78% | +11.53%+0.21% | +27.24%n/a | -3.77%n/a |
| Flows | SMOG NUKZ | --$23M | -$4M-$52M | -$3M+$9M | -$10M+$173M | -$66M- | -$103M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMOG NUKZ | +22.31%+24.16% | +21.83%+27.70% | +21.68%n/a | +24.59%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMOG NUKZ | -12.72%-14.77% | -16.90%-19.49% | -19.34%n/a | -47.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMOG NUKZ | 88d89d | 130d135d | 226dn/a | 1782dn/a |
Trading data
SMOG | NUKZ | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $136.47 | $62.22 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $137.87 | $63.35 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $136.47 | $62.22 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $130.85 M | $715.32 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 3, 2007 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMOG
USA
35.01%
China
15.08%
Spain
11.19%
Denmark
7.43%
Italy
7.3%
Other
23.99%
NUKZ
USA
52.97%
Canada
10.23%
Republic of Korea
9.61%
Japan
7.51%
Other
19.69%
Sectors
SMOG
Utilities
39.11%
Industrials
30.46%
Consumer Cyclical.
21.43%
Other
9.01%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.7%
Utilities
33.39%
Energy
9.01%
Other
6.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
SMOG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SMOG
Iberdrola SA
8.77%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
7.62%
Enel SpA
7.03%
Tesla, Inc.
6.83%
BYD Co., Ltd.
6.32%
Bloom Energy Corp.
5.60%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
4.85%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
3.36%
First Solar, Inc.
3.13%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
2.94%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.85%
Kingspan Group Plc
2.42%
AXIA Energia SA
2.36%
Ørsted A/S
2.08%
Nextpower, Inc.
1.85%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
7.86%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.85%
Endesa SA
3.76%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.73%
CEZ as
3.58%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.40%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.34%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.19%
PG&E Corp.
2.97%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.94%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.91%
Fortum Oyj
2.88%
Vistra Corp.
2.87%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.75%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about SMOG and NUKZ
How have the SMOG and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, SMOG is up 5.31% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has lost -1.78%. That puts SMOG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMOG or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the SMOG ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$9M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMOG or NUKZ?
Over the past year, SMOG had a volatility of 21.83%, while NUKZ experienced 27.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMOG or NUKZ?
As of September 18, 2026, SMOG holds $130.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $715.32 M.
What sectors do the SMOG and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
SMOG leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the SMOG ETF and NUKZ ETF?
SMOG top holdings include Iberdrola SA, NextEra Energy, Inc. and Enel SpA. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., GE Vernova, Inc. and Endesa SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMOG or NUKZ?
SMOG holds 56 securities with 68% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SMOG & NUKZ
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
