SMOGvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. SMOG's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. SMOG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. SMOG is up 0.96% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs worse with -10.13% YTD performance, and -$37M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMOG and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMOG vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMOG NUKZ | -3.26%-5.62% | -4.52%-9.56% | +0.96%-10.13% | -2.59%-21.95% | +39.67%n/a | -21.16%n/a |
| Flows | SMOG NUKZ | --$39M | --$74M | -$3M-$37M | -$7M-$20M | -$56M- | -$103M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMOG NUKZ | +17.80%+22.28% | +21.74%+26.74% | +21.34%n/a | +24.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMOG NUKZ | -9.39%-17.18% | -17.86%-25.42% | -19.34%n/a | -46.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMOG NUKZ | 82d75d | 175d177d | 226dn/a | 1820dn/a |
Trading data
SMOG | NUKZ | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $130.47 | $56.42 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $128.73 | $56.79 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $130.47 | $56.42 |
| 1D performance | +1.35% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $125.45 M | $610.52 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
SMOG | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 55 | 52 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 3, 2007 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMOG
USA
35.54%
China
12.21%
Spain
10.6%
Republic of Korea
7.69%
Denmark
7.06%
Other
26.9%
NUKZ
USA
54.39%
Canada
11.58%
Japan
9.56%
Republic of Korea
8.87%
Other
15.6%
Sectors
SMOG
Utilities
38.27%
Industrials
31.21%
Consumer Cyclical.
20.77%
Other
9.75%
NUKZ
Industrials
46.84%
Utilities
33.16%
Energy
12.93%
Other
7.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
SMOG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.22%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
SMOG
Iberdrola SA
8.47%
Tesla, Inc.
8.09%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.84%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
6.78%
Enel SpA
6.61%
BYD Co., Ltd.
5.32%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
4.61%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.18%
AXIA Energia SA
3.59%
Kingspan Group Plc
3.17%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
3.05%
First Solar, Inc.
2.72%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.02%
Ørsted A/S
1.98%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
1.77%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
9.09%
Oklo, Inc.
3.40%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.27%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.19%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.07%
Endesa SA
2.94%
Fortum Oyj
2.94%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.92%
Vistra Corp.
2.88%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
2.84%
Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
2.80%
Korea Electric Power Corp.
2.75%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.72%
PG&E Corp.
2.67%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.60%
Frequently asked questions about SMOG and NUKZ
How have the SMOG and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, SMOG is up 0.96% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has lost -10.13%. That puts SMOG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMOG or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the SMOG ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$37M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMOG or NUKZ?
Over the past year, SMOG had a volatility of 21.74%, while NUKZ experienced 26.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMOG or NUKZ?
As of November 2, 2026, SMOG holds $125.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $610.52 M.
What sectors do the SMOG and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
SMOG leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the SMOG ETF and NUKZ ETF?
SMOG top holdings include Iberdrola SA, Tesla, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and GE Vernova, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SMOG or NUKZ?
SMOG holds 55 securities with 69.22% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 52 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SMOG & NUKZ
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
