Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMMDvsVBETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB) is part of the US Small Cap segment. SMMD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, VB's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SMMD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.03% for VB. SMMD is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$62M in YTD flows. VB performs worse with 1.14% YTD performance, and +$423M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMMD and VB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMMD vs VB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMMD VB | -4.64%-4.49% | -0.52%-0.34% | +1.28%+1.14% | +22.91%+19.21% | +50.03%+49.53% | +25.16%+26.68% |
| Flows | SMMD VB | +$105M+$432M | +$126M+$488M | +$62M+$423M | +$678M+$528M | +$1.36B+$9.74B | +$1.70B+$15.60B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMMD VB | +17.13%+16.19% | +22.05%+21.77% | +19.24%+18.88% | +20.92%+20.68% |
| Max drawdown | SMMD VB | -6.97%-6.81% | -15.86%-15.79% | -25.55%-25.25% | -28.20%-28.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMMD VB | 14d14d | 46d46d | 283d296d | 980d980d |
SMMD | VB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.81 | $260.61 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $76.02 | $260.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMMD | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMMD | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.81 | $260.61 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $2.28 B | $70.18 B |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMMD and VB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SMMD is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while VB has returned 1.14%. That puts SMMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMMD or VB?
Year-to-date, the SMMD ETF saw +$62M in flows, compared to +$423M for VB.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMMD or VB?
Over the past year, SMMD had a volatility of 22.05%, while VB experienced 21.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMMD or VB?
As of March 12, 2026, SMMD holds $2.28 B in assets under management (AUM), while VB manages $70.18 B.
What sectors do the SMMD and VB ETFs invest in?
SMMD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, VB focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SMMD ETF and VB ETF?
SMMD top holdings include US80004C2008, COMFORT SYSTEMS USA and BLOOM ENERGY CORP. VB holds in its top three: US80004C2008, US7731211089 and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMMD or VB?
SMMD holds 2438 securities with 6.56% of its assets in the top 15. VB has 1315 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.86%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
