Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMLFvsFDLSETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SMLF's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, FDLS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SMLF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.69% for FDLS. SMLF is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$423M in YTD flows. FDLS performs better with 5.12% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMLF and FDLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMLF vs FDLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMLF FDLS | -4.37%-3.20% | -2.09%+1.26% | -0.46%+5.12% | +21.31%+33.53% | +56.96%+67.33% | +48.60%n/a |
| Flows | SMLF FDLS | +$87M+$12M | +$465M+$38M | +$423M+$33M | +$1.33B+$62M | +$1.83B+$79M | +$1.94B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMLF FDLS | +17.18%+16.01% | +22.71%+21.01% | +19.94%+18.41% | +21.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SMLF FDLS | -7.17%-5.30% | -16.13%-15.34% | -26.10%-23.13% | -26.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMLF FDLS | 49d13d | 46d46d | 266d219d | 266dn/a |
SMLF | FDLS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.39 | $37.11 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $74.43 | $36.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMLF | FDLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMLF | FDLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.39 | $37.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.90% |
| AuM | $3.22 B | $165.26 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.69% |
SMLF | FDLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor USD Gross Return | WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 762 | 87 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 28, 2015 | August 23, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMLF and FDLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SMLF is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while FDLS has returned 5.12%. That puts FDLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMLF or FDLS?
Year-to-date, the SMLF ETF saw +$423M in flows, compared to +$33M for FDLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMLF or FDLS?
Over the past year, SMLF had a volatility of 22.71%, while FDLS experienced 21.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMLF or FDLS?
As of March 12, 2026, SMLF holds $3.22 B in assets under management (AUM), while FDLS manages $165.26 M.
What sectors do the SMLF and FDLS ETFs invest in?
SMLF leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FDLS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SMLF ETF and FDLS ETF?
SMLF top holdings include US80004C2008, EMCOR GROUP and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA. FDLS holds in its top three: MKS INSTRUMENTS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES REUNITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMLF or FDLS?
SMLF holds 840 securities with 10.75% of its assets in the top 15. FDLS has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.11%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
