Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMDVvsSVALETF Comparison
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) is part of the US Small Cap Value segment. SMDV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, SVAL's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. SMDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.2% for SVAL. SMDV is up 4.16% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. SVAL performs better with 4.5% YTD performance, and +$103M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMDV and SVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMDV vs SVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMDV SVAL | -6.17%-5.85% | +0.97%+1.34% | +4.16%+4.50% | +6.61%+24.54% | +25.32%+44.67% | +16.55%+26.04% |
| Flows | SMDV SVAL | -$7M+$4M | -$19M+$105M | -$15M+$103M | -$84M+$15M | -$304M+$37M | -$257M+$85M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMDV SVAL | +14.78%+16.86% | +18.40%+22.47% | +19.11%+22.47% | +18.84%+22.70% |
| Max drawdown | SMDV SVAL | -6.93%-6.04% | -11.67%-14.79% | -21.17%-27.39% | -21.17%-27.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMDV SVAL | 23d17d | 105d49d | 437d380d | 437d380d |
SMDV | SVAL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:49 PM | $68.57 | $35.91 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $68.84 | $36.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMDV | SVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMDV | SVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.57 | $35.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.39% | -0.44% |
| AuM | $625.66 M | $168.72 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.2% |
SMDV | SVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index | Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 103 | 230 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 3, 2015 | October 27, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMDV and SVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SMDV is up 4.16% year-to-date (YTD), while SVAL has returned 4.5%. That puts SVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMDV or SVAL?
Year-to-date, the SMDV ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$103M for SVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMDV or SVAL?
Over the past year, SMDV had a volatility of 18.4%, while SVAL experienced 22.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMDV or SVAL?
As of March 11, 2026, SMDV holds $625.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while SVAL manages $168.72 M.
What sectors do the SMDV and SVAL ETFs invest in?
SMDV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Utilities. Meanwhile, SVAL focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SMDV ETF and SVAL ETF?
SMDV top holdings include MATSON, INSPERITY and STEPAN. SVAL holds in its top three: US0669224778, TETRA TECHNOLOGIES and AMARK PRECIOUS/D.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMDV or SVAL?
SMDV holds 104 securities with 16.17% of its assets in the top 15. SVAL has 241 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.82%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
