Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SMDVvsDGRSETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SMDV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, DGRS's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. SMDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.38% for DGRS. SMDV is up 4.93% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. DGRS performs better with 7.29% YTD performance, and +$196K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMDV and DGRS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMDV vs DGRS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMDV DGRS | -5.42%-5.56% | +2.70%+4.47% | +4.93%+7.29% | +6.55%+14.81% | +24.03%+37.40% | +17.49%+28.56% |
| Flows | SMDV DGRS | -$7M+$6M | -$20M-$5M | -$15M+$196K | -$87M-$90M | -$303M+$66M | -$257M+$135M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMDV DGRS | +14.82%+16.61% | +18.40%+22.67% | +19.13%+20.42% | +18.84%+20.67% |
| Max drawdown | SMDV DGRS | -6.23%-5.66% | -11.67%-14.81% | -21.17%-27.66% | -21.17%-27.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMDV DGRS | 22d29d | 105d98d | 437d435d | 437d435d |
SMDV | DGRS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.84 | $53.05 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $69.34 | $53.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SMDV | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SMDV | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.84 | $53.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $630.32 M | $364.60 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.38% |
SMDV | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 103 | 195 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 3, 2015 | July 25, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SMDV and DGRS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SMDV is up 4.93% year-to-date (YTD), while DGRS has returned 7.29%. That puts DGRS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMDV or DGRS?
Year-to-date, the SMDV ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$196K for DGRS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMDV or DGRS?
Over the past year, SMDV had a volatility of 18.4%, while DGRS experienced 22.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMDV or DGRS?
As of March 10, 2026, SMDV holds $630.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while DGRS manages $364.60 M.
What sectors do the SMDV and DGRS ETFs invest in?
SMDV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Utilities. Meanwhile, DGRS focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SMDV ETF and DGRS ETF?
SMDV top holdings include MATSON, INSPERITY and STEPAN. DGRS holds in its top three: ARCHROCK, CAL MAINE FOODS and CALIFORNIA RESOURCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMDV or DGRS?
SMDV holds 104 securities with 16.17% of its assets in the top 15. DGRS has 202 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
