SMAPvsXMHQETF Comparison
VS
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SMAP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. SMAP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. SMAP is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with -$26K in YTD flows. XMHQ performs worse with 3.11% YTD performance, and -$112M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMAP and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMAP vs XMHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMAP XMHQ | +7.81%+4.93% | +0.18%-2.06% | +3.74%+3.11% | +13.66%+14.73% | n/a+51.88% | n/a+46.08% |
| Flows | SMAP XMHQ | --$35M | -$26K-$105M | -$26K-$112M | -$26K-$309M | -+$3.62B | -+$4.11B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMAP XMHQ | +17.96%+16.97% | +16.09%+15.75% | n/a+18.58% | n/a+20.75% |
| Max drawdown | SMAP XMHQ | -9.95%-7.94% | -9.95%-8.74% | n/a-24.40% | n/a-25.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMAP XMHQ | 68d45d | 68d116d | n/a415d | n/a597d |
Trading data
SMAP | XMHQ | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.61 | $107.33 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $26.04 | $105.44 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMAP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSMAP | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMAP | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.61 | $107.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.64% | +1.79% |
| AuM | $1.28 M | $5.10 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.31% |
Characteristics
SMAP | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 79 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 23, 2024 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMAP
USA
94.92%
Other
5.08%
XMHQ
USA
91.04%
Other
8.96%
Sectors
SMAP
Industrials
18.99%
Financials
14.65%
Health Care
14.16%
Information Techn.
12.84%
Consumer Discreti.
8.3%
Materials
7.57%
Other
23.49%
XMHQ
Industrials
20.68%
Health Care
20.27%
Financials
14.96%
Materials
10.45%
Consumer Discreti.
10.08%
Information Techn.
8.91%
Other
14.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
SMAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.84%
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
SMAP
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
3.71%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
3.32%
WEST PHARM SVCS
3.10%
STIFEL FINANCIAL
3.05%
MATADOR RESOURCES
3.01%
MKS INSTRUMENTS
2.87%
CURTISS WRIGHT
2.77%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2.74%
WATSCO
2.64%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP
2.63%
MARKET CORPORATION
2.54%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.54%
EAGLE MATERIALS
2.38%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.28%
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
2.26%
XMHQ
TECHNIPFMC PLC
4.98%
UTD THERAPEUT
3.88%
ILLUMINA
3.51%
MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC
2.92%
US65290E1010
2.72%
CARLISLE COMPANIES
2.68%
TWILIO
2.59%
ROYAL GOLD
2.58%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.55%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.34%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
2.27%
EXELIXIS
2.12%
PENUMBRA
2.12%
US87422Q1094
2.07%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS
1.99%
Frequently asked questions about SMAP and XMHQ
How have the SMAP and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 29, 2026, SMAP is up 3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 3.11%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMAP or XMHQ?
Year-to-date, the SMAP ETF saw -$26K in flows, compared to -$112M for XMHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMAP or XMHQ?
Over the past year, SMAP had a volatility of 16.09%, while XMHQ experienced 15.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMAP or XMHQ?
As of April 29, 2026, SMAP holds $1.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.10 B.
What sectors do the SMAP and XMHQ ETFs invest in?
SMAP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SMAP ETF and XMHQ ETF?
SMAP top holdings include MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS. XMHQ holds in its top three: TECHNIPFMC PLC, UTD THERAPEUT and ILLUMINA.
Which ETF is more diversified: SMAP or XMHQ?
SMAP holds 56 securities with 41.84% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
