Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SLYGvsCAFGETF Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SLYG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, CAFG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. SLYG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.59% for CAFG. SLYG is up 1.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. CAFG performs better with 4.57% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SLYG and CAFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SLYG vs CAFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SLYG CAFG | -5.24%-4.27% | -1.81%+2.40% | +1.20%+4.57% | +16.96%+14.49% | +38.96%n/a | +12.12%n/a |
| Flows | SLYG CAFG | +$331M- | +$292M+$1M | +$282M+$1M | +$170M-$2M | +$784M- | +$1.25B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SLYG CAFG | +16.71%+18.51% | +22.16%+21.04% | +20.06%n/a | +21.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SLYG CAFG | -7.28%-6.32% | -15.18%-12.84% | -27.35%n/a | -29.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SLYG CAFG | 14d14d | 46d37d | 414dn/a | 980dn/a |
SLYG | CAFG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.28 | $26.55 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $95.37 | $26.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SLYG | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SLYG | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.28 | $26.55 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $3.90 B | $19.23 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.59% |
SLYG | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index | Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 309 | 97 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2000 | May 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SLYG and CAFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SLYG is up 1.2% year-to-date (YTD), while CAFG has returned 4.57%. That puts CAFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SLYG or CAFG?
Year-to-date, the SLYG ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$1M for CAFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SLYG or CAFG?
Over the past year, SLYG had a volatility of 22.16%, while CAFG experienced 21.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: SLYG or CAFG?
As of March 12, 2026, SLYG holds $3.90 B in assets under management (AUM), while CAFG manages $19.23 M.
What sectors do the SLYG and CAFG ETFs invest in?
SLYG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, CAFG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SLYG ETF and CAFG ETF?
SLYG top holdings include ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC, MOOG and INTERDIGITAL. CAFG holds in its top three: VICOR, POWELL INDUSTRIES and SEMTECH.
Which ETF is more diversified: SLYG or CAFG?
SLYG holds 334 securities with 14.8% of its assets in the top 15. CAFG has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.65%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
