Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SIZEvsIMCBETF Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. SIZE's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, IMCB's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SIZE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.04% for IMCB. SIZE is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. IMCB performs better with 0.96% YTD performance, and +$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SIZE and IMCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SIZE vs IMCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SIZE IMCB | -3.63%-3.43% | -1.67%+0.08% | -0.92%+0.96% | +13.31%+15.96% | +49.15%+50.37% | +42.96%+42.70% |
| Flows | SIZE IMCB | -$8M+$5M | +$8M+$38M | -$8M+$17M | +$37M+$302M | -$47M+$399M | -$670M+$286M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SIZE IMCB | +12.41%+13.35% | +17.58%+18.28% | +14.76%+15.34% | +17.05%+17.67% |
| Max drawdown | SIZE IMCB | -5.47%-5.95% | -13.31%-13.82% | -18.57%-19.88% | -24.05%-25.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | SIZE IMCB | 14d14d | 46d46d | 219d238d | 820d835d |
SIZE | IMCB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $160.04 | $83.47 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $160.10 | $83.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SIZE | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SIZE | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $160.04 | $83.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $376.37 M | $1.43 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.04% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SIZE and IMCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SIZE is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCB has returned 0.96%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SIZE or IMCB?
Year-to-date, the SIZE ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$17M for IMCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: SIZE or IMCB?
Over the past year, SIZE had a volatility of 17.58%, while IMCB experienced 18.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: SIZE or IMCB?
As of March 12, 2026, SIZE holds $376.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCB manages $1.43 B.
What sectors do the SIZE and IMCB ETFs invest in?
SIZE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, IMCB focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SIZE ETF and IMCB ETF?
SIZE top holdings include US7731211089, ECHOSTAR and WESTERN DIGITAL. IMCB holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: SIZE or IMCB?
SIZE holds 544 securities with 4.05% of its assets in the top 15. IMCB has 403 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.81%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
