Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SHOCvsSOXQETF Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. SHOC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, SOXQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology SHOC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.19% for SOXQ. SHOC is up 6.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. SOXQ performs better with 8.04% YTD performance, and +$146M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SHOC and SOXQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SHOC vs SOXQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHOC SOXQ | -4.49%-5.97% | +8.60%+9.48% | +6.58%+8.04% | +76.31%+72.65% | +165.07%+167.49% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SHOC SOXQ | +$4M+$55M | +$9M+$146M | +$9M+$146M | +$27M+$314M | +$69M+$585M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SHOC SOXQ | +32.64%+34.30% | +37.51%+39.68% | +34.61%+35.16% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SHOC SOXQ | -9.99%-11.21% | -22.18%-24.09% | -37.65%-39.34% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SHOC SOXQ | 16d16d | 46d46d | 364d398d | n/an/a |
SHOC | SOXQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.95 | $60.23 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $73.63 | $60.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SHOC | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SHOC | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.95 | $60.23 |
| 1D performance | -0.92% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $156.97 M | $1.01 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.19% |
SHOC | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index | PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | June 9, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SHOC and SOXQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SHOC is up 6.58% year-to-date (YTD), while SOXQ has returned 8.04%. That puts SOXQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SHOC or SOXQ?
Year-to-date, the SHOC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$146M for SOXQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SHOC or SOXQ?
Over the past year, SHOC had a volatility of 37.51%, while SOXQ experienced 39.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: SHOC or SOXQ?
As of March 13, 2026, SHOC holds $156.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while SOXQ manages $1.01 B.
What sectors do the SHOC and SOXQ ETFs invest in?
SHOC leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SOXQ focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SHOC ETF and SOXQ ETF?
SHOC top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY. SOXQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: SHOC or SOXQ?
SHOC holds 30 securities with 88.67% of its assets in the top 15. SOXQ has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.42%.
NVIDIA's Stellar Earnings Boost Semiconductor ETFs
3 ETFs Impacted Most by Nvidia's Recent Earnings Report
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
