Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SHOCvsQTECETF Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund ETF
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund ETF (QTEC) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. SHOC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, QTEC's top sector exposures are Information Technology and Communication Services.Consumer Discretionary, SHOC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.55% for QTEC. SHOC is up 9.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. QTEC performs worse with -2.28% YTD performance, and -$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SHOC and QTEC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SHOC vs QTEC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHOC QTEC | -1.46%-1.75% | +4.03%-6.69% | +9.66%-2.28% | +85.88%+28.69% | +172.16%+91.22% | n/a+64.44% |
| Flows | SHOC QTEC | +$7M-$68M | +$8M-$52M | +$9M-$28M | +$27M-$1.26B | +$69M-$200M | --$1.64B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SHOC QTEC | +34.01%+25.31% | +37.46%+30.20% | +34.61%+26.21% | n/a+30.02% |
| Max drawdown | SHOC QTEC | -10.48%-10.85% | -22.18%-20.60% | -37.65%-29.25% | n/a-45.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | SHOC QTEC | 26d41d | 46d45d | 364d127d | n/a788d |
SHOC | QTEC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.72 | $225.23 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $75.31 | $224.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SHOC | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SHOC | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.72 | $225.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | +0.14% |
| AuM | $162.24 M | $2.80 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.55% |
SHOC | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index | NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | April 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SHOC and QTEC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SHOC is up 9.66% year-to-date (YTD), while QTEC has lost -2.28%. That puts SHOC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SHOC or QTEC?
Year-to-date, the SHOC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to -$28M for QTEC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SHOC or QTEC?
Over the past year, SHOC had a volatility of 37.46%, while QTEC experienced 30.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: SHOC or QTEC?
As of March 10, 2026, SHOC holds $162.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while QTEC manages $2.80 B.
What sectors do the SHOC and QTEC ETFs invest in?
SHOC leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, QTEC focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SHOC ETF and QTEC ETF?
SHOC top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY. QTEC holds in its top three: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, WESTERN DIGITAL and SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: SHOC or QTEC?
SHOC holds 30 securities with 88.67% of its assets in the top 15. QTEC has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.01%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
