Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SHOCvsIYWETF Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. SHOC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, IYW's top sector exposures are Information Technology and Communication Services.Industrials, SHOC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.38% for IYW. SHOC is up 10.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. IYW performs worse with -3.49% YTD performance, and -$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SHOC and IYW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SHOC vs IYW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHOC IYW | -2.88%-1.46% | +5.77%-5.34% | +10.49%-3.49% | +87.16%+35.66% | +174.77%+133.40% | n/a+124.01% |
| Flows | SHOC IYW | +$11M-$811M | +$8M-$1.07B | +$16M-$1.07B | +$34M-$5.10B | +$76M-$2.66B | --$415M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SHOC IYW | +33.97%+21.88% | +37.46%+27.18% | +34.61%+23.38% | n/a+25.90% |
| Max drawdown | SHOC IYW | -9.99%-8.75% | -22.18%-18.45% | -37.65%-26.59% | n/a-39.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | SHOC IYW | 14d42d | 46d45d | 364d125d | n/a690d |
SHOC | IYW | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.72 | $192.67 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $75.31 | $191.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SHOC | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SHOC | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.72 | $192.67 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $170.28 M | $19.21 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.38% |
SHOC | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index | Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 127 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SHOC and IYW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SHOC is up 10.49% year-to-date (YTD), while IYW has lost -3.49%. That puts SHOC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SHOC or IYW?
Year-to-date, the SHOC ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to -$1.07B for IYW.
Which ETF is more volatile: SHOC or IYW?
Over the past year, SHOC had a volatility of 37.46%, while IYW experienced 27.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: SHOC or IYW?
As of March 11, 2026, SHOC holds $170.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while IYW manages $19.21 B.
What sectors do the SHOC and IYW ETFs invest in?
SHOC leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, IYW focuses on Information Technology and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the SHOC ETF and IYW ETF?
SHOC top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and MICRON TECHNOLOGY. IYW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SHOC or IYW?
SHOC holds 30 securities with 88.67% of its assets in the top 15. IYW has 142 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.69%.
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Tech Sinks in First Week of August
What’s Driving the Market, a Look at US Equities
Big Layoffs From Big Tech: What Does it Mean for Investors?
Hard Landing – What does this mean for markets?
Hard Landing – What does this mean for markets?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
