Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SFYFvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is part of the Options Strategies segment. SFYF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, GPIQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SFYF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. SFYF is down -4.03% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 0.25% YTD performance, and +$595M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SFYF and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SFYF vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SFYF GPIQ | -0.44%-0.61% | -5.20%-0.64% | -4.03%+0.25% | +42.33%+28.17% | +156.61%n/a | +80.83%n/a |
| Flows | SFYF GPIQ | -$3M+$140M | -$3M+$816M | -$3M+$595M | +$5M+$2.54B | +$6M- | +$11M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SFYF GPIQ | +15.78%+14.25% | +26.33%+20.63% | +24.26%n/a | +30.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SFYF GPIQ | -8.44%-4.79% | -17.65%-14.95% | -26.56%n/a | -55.57%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SFYF GPIQ | 75d40d | 45d45d | 127dn/a | 1095dn/a |
SFYF | GPIQ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.79 | $51.63 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $53.59 | $51.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SFYF | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SFYF | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.79 | $51.63 |
| 1D performance | +0.37% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $35.89 M | $3.09 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.35% |
SFYF | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SoFi | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | SoFi Social 50 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SFYF and GPIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SFYF is down -4.03% year-to-date (YTD), while GPIQ has returned 0.25%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SFYF or GPIQ?
Year-to-date, the SFYF ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$595M for GPIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SFYF or GPIQ?
Over the past year, SFYF had a volatility of 26.33%, while GPIQ experienced 20.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: SFYF or GPIQ?
As of March 10, 2026, SFYF holds $35.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while GPIQ manages $3.09 B.
What sectors do the SFYF and GPIQ ETFs invest in?
SFYF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, GPIQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SFYF ETF and GPIQ ETF?
SFYF top holdings include TESLA, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC. GPIQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SFYF or GPIQ?
SFYF holds 47 securities with 70% of its assets in the top 15. GPIQ has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.81%.
ETFs That Bet on Social Media Sentiment: A Look at BUZZ, SFYF, and MEME
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
