Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SFLOvsPRFZETF Comparison
VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SFLO's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, PRFZ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. SFLO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.34% for PRFZ. SFLO is up 1.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. PRFZ performs better with 2.25% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SFLO and PRFZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SFLO vs PRFZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SFLO PRFZ | -2.03%-4.41% | -1.38%-0.68% | +1.13%+2.25% | +22.56%+25.07% | n/a+49.60% | n/a+38.00% |
| Flows | SFLO PRFZ | +$10M+$19M | +$49M+$12M | +$40M+$26M | +$216M-$181M | --$119M | -+$20M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SFLO PRFZ | +15.63%+16.81% | +24.14%+22.34% | n/a+20.52% | n/a+21.31% |
| Max drawdown | SFLO PRFZ | -3.40%-5.90% | -18.70%-16.14% | n/a-26.51% | n/a-26.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | SFLO PRFZ | 36d47d | 49d46d | n/a283d | n/a283d |
SFLO | PRFZ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.82 | $46.77 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $29.75 | $46.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SFLO | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SFLO | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.82 | $46.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $489.18 M | $2.67 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.34% |
SFLO | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Victory U.S. Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 184 | 1282 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | September 20, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SFLO and PRFZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SFLO is up 1.13% year-to-date (YTD), while PRFZ has returned 2.25%. That puts PRFZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SFLO or PRFZ?
Year-to-date, the SFLO ETF saw +$40M in flows, compared to +$26M for PRFZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: SFLO or PRFZ?
Over the past year, SFLO had a volatility of 24.14%, while PRFZ experienced 22.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: SFLO or PRFZ?
As of March 10, 2026, SFLO holds $489.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while PRFZ manages $2.67 B.
What sectors do the SFLO and PRFZ ETFs invest in?
SFLO leans toward sectors like Energy, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, PRFZ focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SFLO ETF and PRFZ ETF?
SFLO top holdings include ALKERMES, CONSOL ENERGY INC and CRESCENT ENERGY COMPANY. PRFZ holds in its top three: OPENDOOR TECHNOLOGIES INC, HECLA MINING and IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: SFLO or PRFZ?
SFLO holds 185 securities with 18.46% of its assets in the top 15. PRFZ has 1412 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
