Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SEIMvsGSLCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SEIM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GSLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. SEIM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.09% for GSLC. SEIM is up 2.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$90M in YTD flows. GSLC performs worse with -1.3% YTD performance, and -$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SEIM and GSLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SEIM vs GSLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SEIM GSLC | -2.36%-2.44% | +2.17%-1.10% | +2.21%-1.30% | +32.88%+19.70% | +95.39%+73.77% | n/a+80.66% |
| Flows | SEIM GSLC | +$35M+$33M | +$68M-$214M | +$90M-$289M | +$474M-$242M | +$869M-$2.26B | --$3.77B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SEIM GSLC | +18.58%+11.60% | +21.56%+18.06% | +17.90%+14.64% | n/a+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | SEIM GSLC | -4.96%-3.81% | -15.24%-13.56% | -22.41%-18.65% | n/a-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | SEIM GSLC | 12d56d | 45d45d | 153d126d | n/a713d |
SEIM | GSLC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.14 | $129.93 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $47.22 | $130.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SEIM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SEIM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.14 | $129.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $1.17 B | $14.53 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.09% |
SEIM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | SEI | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 405 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 18, 2022 | September 17, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SEIM and GSLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, SEIM is up 2.21% year-to-date (YTD), while GSLC has lost -1.3%. That puts SEIM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SEIM or GSLC?
Year-to-date, the SEIM ETF saw +$90M in flows, compared to -$289M for GSLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SEIM or GSLC?
Over the past year, SEIM had a volatility of 21.56%, while GSLC experienced 18.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: SEIM or GSLC?
As of March 9, 2026, SEIM holds $1.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSLC manages $14.53 B.
What sectors do the SEIM and GSLC ETFs invest in?
SEIM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSLC focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the SEIM ETF and GSLC ETF?
SEIM top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and MICROSOFT-T. GSLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SEIM or GSLC?
SEIM holds 59 securities with 49.71% of its assets in the top 15. GSLC has 432 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
