SECTvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. SECT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. SECT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.73%, versus 0.15% for IWB. SECT is up 11.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$124M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and -$2.84B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SECT and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SECT vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SECT IWB | +2.42%+0.48% | +0.27%+0.85% | +11.88%+12.06% | +21.17%+19.45% | +66.21%+73.74% | +74.87%+74.30% |
| Flows | SECT IWB | +$29M-$782M | +$85M-$841M | +$124M-$2.84B | +$212M-$1.79B | +$584M-$3.14B | +$852M-$3.14B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SECT IWB | +17.28%+13.43% | +14.81%+12.93% | +17.24%+15.23% | +18.22%+17.34% |
| Max drawdown | SECT IWB | -5.52%-4.33% | -10.65%-8.86% | -21.73%-19.16% | -21.73%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | SECT IWB | 62d59d | 94d76d | 129d126d | 695d709d |
Trading data
SECT | IWB | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.18 | $418.57 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $71.00 | $416.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SECT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSECT | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SECT | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.18 | $418.57 |
| 1D performance | +0.25% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $2.87 B | $48.48 B |
| E/R | 0.73% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
SECT | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Main Management ETF Advisors | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 389 | 1002 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 5, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SECT
USA
95.06%
Other
4.94%
IWB
USA
96.23%
Other
3.77%
Sectors
SECT
Technology
41.61%
Finance
19.02%
Industrials
11.03%
Other
28.34%
IWB
Technology
42.41%
Finance
14.69%
Healthcare
9.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
16.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
SECT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.15%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SECT
NVIDIA Corp.
5.82%
Apple, Inc.
5.50%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.57%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.30%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
2.29%
Broadcom Inc.
2.21%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.83%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.64%
Visa, Inc.
1.49%
Tesla, Inc.
1.48%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.36%
Intel Corp.
1.26%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.18%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.13%
IWB
Apple, Inc.
7.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.83%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.34%
Tesla, Inc.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.15%
US30233Q1085
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about SECT and IWB
How have the SECT and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, SECT is up 11.88% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 12.06%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SECT or IWB?
Year-to-date, the SECT ETF saw +$124M in flows, compared to -$2.84B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: SECT or IWB?
Over the past year, SECT had a volatility of 14.81%, while IWB experienced 12.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: SECT or IWB?
As of August 31, 2026, SECT holds $2.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.48 B.
What sectors do the SECT and IWB ETFs invest in?
SECT leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the SECT ETF and IWB ETF?
SECT top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SECT or IWB?
SECT holds 393 securities with 36.15% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.24%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
