Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCZvsWSMLETF Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) belong to the same industry segment: DM Small Cap. SCZ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, WSML's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. SCZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.3% for WSML. SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$533M in YTD flows. WSML performs better with 2.22% YTD performance, and -$203M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCZ and WSML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCZ vs WSML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCZ WSML | -7.06%-5.38% | +3.31%+1.79% | +1.40%+2.22% | +26.60%n/a | +49.88%n/a | +26.74%n/a |
| Flows | SCZ WSML | +$272M-$203M | +$745M-$191M | +$533M-$203M | +$2.53B- | -$662M- | +$94M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCZ WSML | +14.30%+14.70% | +14.88%n/a | +14.01%n/a | +15.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCZ WSML | -8.54%-7.36% | -13.31%n/a | -14.86%n/a | -36.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCZ WSML | 11d14d | 37dn/a | 154dn/a | 1362dn/a |
SCZ | WSML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:18 PM | $78.45 | $30.92 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.01 | $30.95 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCZ | WSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCZ | WSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.45 | $30.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.71% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $13.36 B | $590.18 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCZ and WSML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD), while WSML has returned 2.22%. That puts WSML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCZ or WSML?
Year-to-date, the SCZ ETF saw +$533M in flows, compared to -$203M for WSML.
Which ETF is bigger: SCZ or WSML?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ holds $13.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while WSML manages $590.18 M.
What sectors do the SCZ and WSML ETFs invest in?
SCZ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, WSML focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCZ ETF and WSML ETF?
SCZ top holdings include TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR, BAWAG GROUP AG and IBIDEN. WSML holds in its top three: US80004C2008, US0669224778 and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCZ or WSML?
SCZ holds 1996 securities with 4.38% of its assets in the top 15. WSML has 3369 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.2%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
