Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCZvsFNDCETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF (FNDC) belong to the same industry segment: DM Small Cap. SCZ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, FNDC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. SCZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.39% for FNDC. SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$533M in YTD flows. FNDC performs better with 3.95% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCZ and FNDC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCZ vs FNDC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCZ FNDC | -7.06%-6.75% | +3.31%+5.23% | +1.40%+3.95% | +26.60%+32.11% | +49.88%+59.29% | +26.74%+43.79% |
| Flows | SCZ FNDC | +$272M- | +$745M+$39M | +$533M-$14M | +$2.53B-$747M | -$662M-$789M | +$94M+$51M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCZ FNDC | +14.30%+15.27% | +14.88%+14.56% | +14.01%+13.24% | +15.98%+14.12% |
| Max drawdown | SCZ FNDC | -8.54%-8.61% | -13.31%-12.20% | -14.86%-13.02% | -36.93%-32.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCZ FNDC | 11d11d | 37d36d | 154d208d | 1362d1100d |
SCZ | FNDC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.83 | $45.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.01 | $46.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCZ | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCZ | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.83 | $45.67 |
| 1D performance | -1.49% | -1.25% |
| AuM | $13.36 B | $3.14 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.39% |
SCZ | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Small Index |
| N° of holdings | 1858 | 1370 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2007 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCZ and FNDC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDC has returned 3.95%. That puts FNDC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCZ or FNDC?
Year-to-date, the SCZ ETF saw +$533M in flows, compared to -$14M for FNDC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCZ or FNDC?
Over the past year, SCZ had a volatility of 14.88%, while FNDC experienced 14.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCZ or FNDC?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ holds $13.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDC manages $3.14 B.
What sectors do the SCZ and FNDC ETFs invest in?
SCZ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, FNDC focuses on Industrials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCZ ETF and FNDC ETF?
SCZ top holdings include TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR, BAWAG GROUP AG and IBIDEN. FNDC holds in its top three: IBIDEN, SALZGITTER and PAN AMERICAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCZ or FNDC?
SCZ holds 1996 securities with 4.38% of its assets in the top 15. FNDC has 1454 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.41%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
