Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCOWvsXSHQETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XSHQ's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. SCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.29% for XSHQ. SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$512K in YTD flows. XSHQ performs better with -0.98% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and XSHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCOW vs XSHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW XSHQ | -4.18%-6.95% | -5.90%-3.61% | -2.14%-0.98% | n/a+12.23% | n/a+31.80% | n/a+16.00% |
| Flows | SCOW XSHQ | --$5M | +$512K-$16M | +$512K-$13M | --$218M | -+$204M | -+$196M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW XSHQ | +18.42%+16.24% | n/a+21.73% | n/a+20.21% | n/a+21.19% |
| Max drawdown | SCOW XSHQ | -6.87%-8.19% | n/a-13.47% | n/a-27.13% | n/a-27.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW XSHQ | 81d32d | n/a37d | n/a473d | n/a473d |
SCOW | XSHQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.74 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCOW | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCOW | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $41.74 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.26% |
| AuM | $1.44 M | $231.83 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.29% |
SCOW | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 74 | 118 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | April 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCOW and XSHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD), while XSHQ has lost -0.98%. That puts XSHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or XSHQ?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$512K in flows, compared to -$13M for XSHQ.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or XSHQ?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW holds $1.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while XSHQ manages $231.83 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and XSHQ ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XSHQ focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and XSHQ ETF?
SCOW top holdings include JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL. XSHQ holds in its top three: INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or XSHQ?
SCOW holds 75 securities with 48.64% of its assets in the top 15. XSHQ has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
