Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCOWvsRESMETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, RESM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. SCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.32% for RESM. SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$512K in YTD flows. RESM performs better with 3.12% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and RESM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCOW vs RESM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW RESM | -4.18%-4.62% | -5.90%+0.86% | -2.14%+3.12% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCOW RESM | --$2M | +$512K+$3M | +$512K-$2M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW RESM | +18.42%+15.92% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCOW RESM | -6.87%-5.45% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW RESM | 81d13d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SCOW | RESM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.06 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $20.08 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCOW | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCOW | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $20.06 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.13% |
| AuM | $1.44 M | $3.08 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.32% |
SCOW | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 74 | 864 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCOW and RESM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD), while RESM has returned 3.12%. That puts RESM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or RESM?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$512K in flows, compared to -$2M for RESM.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or RESM?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW holds $1.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while RESM manages $3.08 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and RESM ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, RESM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and RESM ETF?
SCOW top holdings include JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL. RESM holds in its top three: FABRINET, LEXINGTON REIT and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or RESM?
SCOW holds 75 securities with 48.64% of its assets in the top 15. RESM has 879 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.1%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
