SCOWvsQVMSETF Comparison
ETF 1
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.03%
VS
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, QVMS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. SCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.15% for QVMS. SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$507K in YTD flows. QVMS performs better with 22.53% YTD performance, and -$662K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and QVMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCOW vs QVMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW QVMS | +2.25%-1.13% | +9.81%+8.04% | +14.61%+22.53% | n/a+31.58% | n/a+49.22% | n/a+52.51% |
| Flows | SCOW QVMS | -+$346K | -+$45K | +$507K-$662K | --$801K | --$34M | -+$109M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW QVMS | +15.30%+15.97% | n/a+17.34% | n/a+20.14% | n/a+20.95% |
| Max drawdown | SCOW QVMS | -4.39%-4.06% | n/a-8.69% | n/a-27.75% | n/a-27.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW QVMS | 19d16d | n/a59d | n/a380d | n/a380d |
Trading data
SCOW | QVMS | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.84 | |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $34.37 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCOW | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCOW | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $33.84 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.53% |
| AuM | $1.68 M | $251.81 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
SCOW | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 539 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCOW
USA
98.23%
Other
1.77%
QVMS
USA
97.55%
Other
2.45%
Sectors
SCOW
Technology
26.86%
Finance
21.35%
Healthcare
11.17%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.23%
Energy
8%
Industrials
7.35%
Other
17.04%
QVMS
Finance
25.4%
Industrials
13.86%
Technology
13.29%
Healthcare
11.67%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.69%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.19%
Other
19.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.78%
QVMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SCOW
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
4.86%
Etsy, Inc.
4.73%
Enova International, Inc.
4.43%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
4.42%
Match Group, Inc.
3.74%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
3.44%
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.39%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
3.23%
Box, Inc.
2.69%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.58%
Paycom Software, Inc.
2.55%
NMI Holdings, Inc.
2.00%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
1.97%
Qorvo, Inc.
1.90%
Teradata Corp.
1.85%
QVMS
Argan, Inc.
0.73%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.68%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.67%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.67%
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.63%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.62%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.58%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.57%
Alkermes Plc
0.53%
Qorvo, Inc.
0.53%
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
0.53%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.53%
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.53%
Eastman Chemical Co.
0.52%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about SCOW and QVMS
How have the SCOW and QVMS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMS has returned 22.53%. That puts QVMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or QVMS?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$507K in flows, compared to -$662K for QVMS.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or QVMS?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW holds $1.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMS manages $251.81 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and QVMS ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QVMS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and QVMS ETF?
SCOW top holdings include Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., Etsy, Inc. and Enova International, Inc.. QVMS holds in its top three: Argan, Inc., Element Solutions, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or QVMS?
SCOW holds 80 securities with 47.78% of its assets in the top 15. QVMS has 539 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
