SCOWvsISMDETF Comparison
ETF 1
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.03%
VS
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, ISMD's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. SCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.53% for ISMD. SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$507K in YTD flows. ISMD performs better with 29.04% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and ISMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCOW vs ISMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW ISMD | +2.25%-0.20% | +9.81%+12.10% | +14.61%+29.04% | n/a+36.10% | n/a+52.01% | n/a+60.87% |
| Flows | SCOW ISMD | -+$127K | -+$16M | +$507K+$33M | -+$52M | -+$74M | -+$128M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW ISMD | +15.30%+16.56% | n/a+18.16% | n/a+20.05% | n/a+20.94% |
| Max drawdown | SCOW ISMD | -4.39%-3.20% | n/a-9.50% | n/a-26.77% | n/a-26.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW ISMD | 19d11d | n/a82d | n/a399d | n/a399d |
Trading data
SCOW | ISMD | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.78 | |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $49.50 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCOW | ISMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCOW | ISMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $48.78 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.44% |
| AuM | $1.68 M | $336.33 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.53% |
Characteristics
SCOW | ISMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 490 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | February 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCOW
USA
98.23%
Other
1.77%
ISMD
USA
97.48%
Other
2.52%
Sectors
SCOW
Technology
26.86%
Finance
21.35%
Healthcare
11.17%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.23%
Energy
8%
Industrials
7.35%
Other
17.04%
ISMD
Finance
23.44%
Technology
16.55%
Industrials
12.55%
Healthcare
11.51%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.76%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.41%
Other
19.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.78%
ISMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SCOW
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
4.86%
Etsy, Inc.
4.73%
Enova International, Inc.
4.43%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
4.42%
Match Group, Inc.
3.74%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
3.44%
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.39%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
3.23%
Box, Inc.
2.69%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.58%
Paycom Software, Inc.
2.55%
NMI Holdings, Inc.
2.00%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
1.97%
Qorvo, Inc.
1.90%
Teradata Corp.
1.85%
ISMD
Agilon Health, Inc.
2.13%
MaxLinear, Inc.
1.18%
Penguin Solutions, Inc.
0.70%
Ambiq Micro, Inc.
0.57%
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
0.48%
Anterix, Inc.
0.42%
Aehr Test Systems
0.42%
CEVA, Inc.
0.41%
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
0.40%
Cohu, Inc.
0.39%
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.
0.37%
Veeco Instruments, Inc.
0.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.35%
Target Hospitality Corp.
0.35%
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
0.35%
Frequently asked questions about SCOW and ISMD
How have the SCOW and ISMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD), while ISMD has returned 29.04%. That puts ISMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or ISMD?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$507K in flows, compared to +$33M for ISMD.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or ISMD?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW holds $1.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while ISMD manages $336.33 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and ISMD ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ISMD focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and ISMD ETF?
SCOW top holdings include Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., Etsy, Inc. and Enova International, Inc.. ISMD holds in its top three: Agilon Health, Inc., MaxLinear, Inc. and Penguin Solutions, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or ISMD?
SCOW holds 80 securities with 47.78% of its assets in the top 15. ISMD has 492 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
