SCOWvsHAPSETF Comparison
ETF 1
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.03%
VS
ETF 2
HAPS
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is part of the segment. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, HAPS's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. SCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.61% for HAPS. SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$507K in YTD flows. HAPS performs better with 19.89% YTD performance, and -$93K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and HAPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCOW vs HAPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW HAPS | +2.25%+0.97% | +9.81%+9.71% | +14.61%+19.89% | n/a+28.80% | n/a+40.41% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCOW HAPS | -- | -+$148K | +$507K-$93K | -+$1M | --$988K | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW HAPS | +15.30%+13.80% | n/a+16.67% | n/a+20.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCOW HAPS | -4.39%-4.51% | n/a-10.02% | n/a-27.24% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW HAPS | 19d28d | n/a83d | n/a393d | n/an/a |
Trading data
SCOW | HAPS | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.29 | |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $37.62 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $37.29 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.88% |
| AuM | $1.68 M | $172.11 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 444 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | April 12, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCOW
USA
98.23%
Other
1.77%
HAPS
USA
97.8%
Other
2.2%
Sectors
SCOW
Technology
26.86%
Finance
21.35%
Healthcare
11.17%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.23%
Energy
8%
Industrials
7.35%
Other
17.04%
HAPS
Finance
26.1%
Healthcare
17.69%
Technology
16.51%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
32.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.78%
HAPS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SCOW
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
4.86%
Etsy, Inc.
4.73%
Enova International, Inc.
4.43%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
4.42%
Match Group, Inc.
3.74%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
3.44%
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.39%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
3.23%
Box, Inc.
2.69%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.58%
Paycom Software, Inc.
2.55%
NMI Holdings, Inc.
2.00%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
1.97%
Qorvo, Inc.
1.90%
Teradata Corp.
1.85%
HAPS
Twist Bioscience Corp.
3.11%
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
2.30%
Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.
1.96%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
1.75%
Organon & Co.
1.70%
Sensient Technologies Corp.
1.59%
Avnet, Inc.
1.54%
Archrock, Inc.
1.54%
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
1.53%
The Chemours Co.
1.51%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.44%
Resideo Technologies, Inc.
1.43%
GATX Corp.
1.33%
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical, Inc.
1.30%
Granite Construction, Inc.
1.30%
Frequently asked questions about SCOW and HAPS
How have the SCOW and HAPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW is up 14.61% year-to-date (YTD), while HAPS has returned 19.89%. That puts HAPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or HAPS?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$507K in flows, compared to -$93K for HAPS.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or HAPS?
As of July 28, 2026, SCOW holds $1.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while HAPS manages $172.11 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and HAPS ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, HAPS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and HAPS ETF?
SCOW top holdings include Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., Etsy, Inc. and Enova International, Inc.. HAPS holds in its top three: Twist Bioscience Corp., Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or HAPS?
SCOW holds 80 securities with 47.78% of its assets in the top 15. HAPS has 444 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SCOW & HAPS
First Trust Launches the First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
November 29, 2023
HAPS
Advertisement
Advertisement
