Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCOWvsHAPSETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is part of the segment. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, HAPS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. SCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.6% for HAPS. SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$512K in YTD flows. HAPS performs better with -0.64% YTD performance, and -$293K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and HAPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCOW vs HAPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW HAPS | -4.18%-5.37% | -5.90%-3.97% | -2.14%-0.64% | n/a+16.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCOW HAPS | --$293K | +$512K+$524K | +$512K-$293K | -+$968K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW HAPS | +18.42%+15.91% | n/a+22.04% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCOW HAPS | -6.87%-6.76% | n/a-16.09% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW HAPS | 81d48d | n/a52d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SCOW | HAPS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.48 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $30.59 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $30.48 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.37% |
| AuM | $1.44 M | $142.65 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.6% |
SCOW | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 74 | 164 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | April 12, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCOW and HAPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD), while HAPS has lost -0.64%. That puts HAPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or HAPS?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$512K in flows, compared to -$293K for HAPS.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or HAPS?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW holds $1.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while HAPS manages $142.65 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and HAPS ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, HAPS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and HAPS ETF?
SCOW top holdings include JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL. HAPS holds in its top three: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and PHILLIPS EDISON AND COMPANY.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or HAPS?
SCOW holds 75 securities with 48.64% of its assets in the top 15. HAPS has 164 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.34%.
First Trust Launches the First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
