Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCOWvsGRPZETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is part of the US Small Cap segment. SCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GRPZ's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. SCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.35% for GRPZ. SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$512K in YTD flows. GRPZ performs better with 0.99% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCOW and GRPZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCOW vs GRPZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCOW GRPZ | -4.18%-7.89% | -5.90%-3.38% | -2.14%+0.99% | n/a+19.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCOW GRPZ | -- | +$512K-$1K | +$512K- | --$5K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCOW GRPZ | +18.42%+16.57% | n/a+22.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCOW GRPZ | -6.87%-8.72% | n/a-14.71% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCOW GRPZ | 81d33d | n/a46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SCOW | GRPZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.81 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.80 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCOW | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCOW | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.81 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.01% |
| AuM | $1.44 M | $2.68 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.35% |
SCOW | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Index |
| N° of holdings | 74 | 89 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | March 27, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCOW and GRPZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW is down -2.14% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPZ has returned 0.99%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCOW or GRPZ?
Year-to-date, the SCOW ETF saw +$512K in flows, compared to - for GRPZ.
Which ETF is bigger: SCOW or GRPZ?
As of March 13, 2026, SCOW holds $1.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPZ manages $2.68 M.
What sectors do the SCOW and GRPZ ETFs invest in?
SCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GRPZ focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SCOW ETF and GRPZ ETF?
SCOW top holdings include JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL. GRPZ holds in its top three: INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCOW or GRPZ?
SCOW holds 75 securities with 48.64% of its assets in the top 15. GRPZ has 90 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.48%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
