SCNMvsIBMQETF Comparison
VS
Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Municipal and Non-Corporate. SCNM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.1% for IBMQ. SCNM is down -2.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$240M in YTD flows. IBMQ performs better with 0.95% YTD performance, and +$112M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCNM and IBMQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCNM vs IBMQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCNM IBMQ | -0.79%+0.01% | -3.74%-0.28% | -2.36%+0.95% | n/a+1.38% | n/a+11.22% | n/a+3.03% |
| Flows | SCNM IBMQ | +$3M+$13M | +$16M+$34M | +$240M+$112M | -+$172M | -+$468M | -+$617M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCNM IBMQ | +5.48%+1.51% | n/a+0.99% | n/a+1.79% | n/a+2.37% |
| Max drawdown | SCNM IBMQ | -6.09%-1.57% | n/a-1.57% | n/a-2.26% | n/a-10.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCNM IBMQ | 92d52d | n/a52d | n/a212d | n/a1300d |
Trading data
SCNM | IBMQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.85 | $25.27 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $23.82 | $25.27 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCNM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCNM | IBMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCNM | IBMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.85 | $25.27 |
| 1D performance | +0.15% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $237.60 M | $683.47 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
SCNM | IBMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Sterling Capital Active ETF | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 908 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2025 | April 16, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCNM
USA
45.91%
Other
54.09%
IBMQ
USA
48.81%
Other
51.19%
Sectors
SCNM
Municipal
43.57%
Other
56.43%
IBMQ
Municipal
48.73%
Other
51.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.62%
IBMQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
SCNM
Federated Hermes Treasury Obligations Fund
2.34%
New Mexico Municipal Energy Acquisition Authority, FRN 1jun2054, USD (2025)
2.05%
US56035DJJ28
1.98%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2056, USD (2024H)
1.88%
US763262DL32
1.85%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jul2033, USD (2026)
1.71%
US57582TFG22
1.69%
US292723BN27
1.62%
Southern California Public Power Authority, 5% 1apr2055, USD (2024A)
1.61%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024F)
1.52%
Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, 4.7% 1dec2055, USD (2025)
1.50%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1oct2035, USD (2020)
1.50%
US837032CT69
1.47%
Chandler Industrial Development Authority, 5% 1sep2052, USD (2022-2)
1.46%
US57584YJU47
1.45%
IBMQ
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023)
0.56%
US13034A5B23
0.51%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E)
0.48%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1jan2028, USD (2017)
0.42%
US235219UU41
0.40%
California, 5% 1oct2030, USD
0.39%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1feb2050, USD
0.38%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2028, USD
0.38%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5% 15jul2031, USD
0.36%
Illinois, 5% 1oct2028, USD (2018A)
0.33%
US60374VEW90
0.32%
Missouri Board of Public Buildings, 4% 1oct2028, USD
0.31%
US18085PTE42
0.30%
North Texas Tollway Authority, 0% 1jan2028, USD (2008D, 7212D)
0.30%
US161045NS42
0.30%
Frequently asked questions about SCNM and IBMQ
How have the SCNM and IBMQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, SCNM is down -2.36% year-to-date (YTD), while IBMQ has returned 0.95%. That puts IBMQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCNM or IBMQ?
Year-to-date, the SCNM ETF saw +$240M in flows, compared to +$112M for IBMQ.
Which ETF is bigger: SCNM or IBMQ?
As of October 15, 2026, SCNM holds $237.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while IBMQ manages $683.47 M.
What sectors do the SCNM and IBMQ ETFs invest in?
SCNM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, IBMQ focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the SCNM ETF and IBMQ ETF?
SCNM top holdings include Federated Hermes Treasury Obligations Fund, New Mexico Municipal Energy Acquisition Authority, FRN 1jun2054, USD (2025) and US56035DJJ28. IBMQ holds in its top three: New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023), US13034A5B23 and New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E).
Which ETF is more diversified: SCNM or IBMQ?
SCNM holds 98 securities with 25.62% of its assets in the top 15. IBMQ has 2776 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.74%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
