Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCJvsFLJPETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF (SCJ) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. SCJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Materials. In contrast, FLJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. SCJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.09% for FLJP. SCJ is up 4.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. FLJP performs better with 5.46% YTD performance, and +$433M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCJ and FLJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCJ vs FLJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCJ FLJP | -8.69%-9.77% | +6.01%+4.46% | +4.80%+5.46% | +28.72%+29.33% | +54.58%+62.77% | +31.39%+41.68% |
| Flows | SCJ FLJP | +$52M+$312M | +$80M+$474M | +$71M+$433M | +$98M+$734M | +$132M+$1.45B | +$149M+$2.01B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCJ FLJP | +17.50%+23.49% | +16.58%+22.54% | +15.17%+20.67% | +15.70%+19.81% |
| Max drawdown | SCJ FLJP | -10.46%-11.09% | -12.88%-16.79% | -13.22%-18.71% | -33.14%-33.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCJ FLJP | 11d28d | 33d37d | 207d235d | 1346d903d |
SCJ | FLJP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.99 | $35.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $96.76 | $36.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCJ | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCJ | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.99 | $35.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -1.00% |
| AuM | $240.14 M | $3.07 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.09% |
SCJ | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Small Cap Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 756 | 475 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2007 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCJ and FLJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCJ is up 4.8% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJP has returned 5.46%. That puts FLJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCJ or FLJP?
Year-to-date, the SCJ ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to +$433M for FLJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCJ or FLJP?
Over the past year, SCJ had a volatility of 16.58%, while FLJP experienced 22.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCJ or FLJP?
As of March 12, 2026, SCJ holds $240.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJP manages $3.07 B.
What sectors do the SCJ and FLJP ETFs invest in?
SCJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Materials. Meanwhile, FLJP focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCJ ETF and FLJP ETF?
SCJ top holdings include IBIDEN, SHOWA DENKO and SHIMIZU. FLJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCJ or FLJP?
SCJ holds 775 securities with 8.96% of its assets in the top 15. FLJP has 484 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.58%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
