Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCJvsDBJPETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF (SCJ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. SCJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Materials. In contrast, DBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. SCJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.45% for DBJP. SCJ is up 4.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. DBJP performs better with 8.86% YTD performance, and +$120M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCJ and DBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCJ vs DBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCJ DBJP | -8.69%-4.46% | +6.01%+10.59% | +4.80%+8.86% | +28.72%+45.46% | +54.58%+122.17% | +31.39%+145.89% |
| Flows | SCJ DBJP | +$52M+$21M | +$80M+$120M | +$71M+$120M | +$98M+$64M | +$132M+$104M | +$149M+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCJ DBJP | +17.50%+23.01% | +16.58%+23.14% | +15.17%+21.46% | +15.70%+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | SCJ DBJP | -10.46%-9.16% | -12.88%-18.53% | -13.22%-25.81% | -33.14%-25.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCJ DBJP | 11d10d | 33d63d | 207d350d | 1346d350d |
SCJ | DBJP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.99 | $100.25 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $96.76 | $101.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.99 | $100.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -0.88% |
| AuM | $240.14 M | $596.00 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.45% |
SCJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Small Cap Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 756 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2007 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCJ and DBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCJ is up 4.8% year-to-date (YTD), while DBJP has returned 8.86%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCJ or DBJP?
Year-to-date, the SCJ ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to +$120M for DBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCJ or DBJP?
Over the past year, SCJ had a volatility of 16.58%, while DBJP experienced 23.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCJ or DBJP?
As of March 12, 2026, SCJ holds $240.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBJP manages $596.00 M.
What sectors do the SCJ and DBJP ETFs invest in?
SCJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Materials. Meanwhile, DBJP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCJ ETF and DBJP ETF?
SCJ top holdings include IBIDEN, SHOWA DENKO and SHIMIZU. DBJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCJ or DBJP?
SCJ holds 775 securities with 8.96% of its assets in the top 15. DBJP has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.31%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
