SCHZvsBABETF Comparison
VS
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. SCHZ's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Government Agencies. In contrast, BAB's top sector exposures are Municipal and Industrials. SCHZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.28% for BAB. SCHZ is down -1.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.54B in YTD flows. BAB performs worse with -3.85% YTD performance, and -$121M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHZ and BAB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCHZ vs BAB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHZ BAB | -1.11%-1.57% | -1.97%-3.31% | -1.35%-3.85% | -0.46%-2.85% | +12.40%+10.90% | -2.93%-9.51% |
| Flows | SCHZ BAB | +$181M-$112M | +$383M-$149M | +$1.54B-$121M | +$2.06B-$10M | +$3.69B-$661M | +$2.99B-$985M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHZ BAB | +3.98%+4.79% | +3.69%+4.68% | +5.08%+6.51% | +5.96%+7.57% |
| Max drawdown | SCHZ BAB | -2.58%-3.99% | -3.28%-6.11% | -4.88%-6.11% | -17.77%-24.57% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHZ BAB | 81d81d | 201d201d | 284d201d | 1618d1748d |
Trading data
SCHZ | BAB | |
Last sale 9/21/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.48 | $25.93 |
| Previous close 09/18/2026 | $22.42 | $25.91 |
| Consolidated volume 09/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCHZ | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 9/21/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCHZ | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.48 | $25.93 |
| 1D performance | +0.27% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $10.61 B | $863.66 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
SCHZ | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index | ICE BofAML US Taxable Municipal Securities Plus Index |
| N° of holdings | 580 | 1315 |
| Asset class | Bonds | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 14, 2011 | November 17, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCHZ
USA
84.04%
Other
15.96%
BAB
USA
88.17%
Other
11.83%
Sectors
SCHZ
Sovereign
72.98%
Industrials
10.26%
Other
16.77%
BAB
Municipal
88.16%
Other
11.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCHZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.86%
BAB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SCHZ
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.64%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4% 15feb2034, USD (B-2034)
0.61%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.59%
USA, Notes 3.5% 31jan2028, USD (U-2028)
0.59%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036)
0.55%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
0.54%
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
0.51%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15nov2032, USD (F-2032)
0.51%
BAB
Illinois, 5.1% 1jun2033, USD
1.43%
California, 7.55% 1apr2039, USD
1.30%
California, 7.6% 1nov2040, USD
0.87%
California, 7.5% 1apr2034, USD
0.85%
Illinois, 6.9% 1mar2035, USD (2010-2)
0.83%
California, 7.3% 1oct2039, USD
0.69%
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 7.102% 1jan2041, USD (2010A)
0.67%
Texas Natural Gas Securitization Finance, 5.169% 1apr2041, USD
0.67%
California, 5.1% 1mar2029, USD
0.65%
California, 7.35% 1nov2039, USD (2009)
0.64%
Metro (OR), 3.25% 1jun2028, USD (2019)
0.61%
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 7.414% 1jan2040, USD
0.57%
Massachusetts, 4.91% 1may2029, USD
0.56%
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 7.425% 15feb2029, USD
0.55%
California, 7.625% 1mar2040, USD (2010)
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about SCHZ and BAB
How have the SCHZ and BAB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, SCHZ is down -1.35% year-to-date (YTD), while BAB has lost -3.85%. That puts SCHZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHZ or BAB?
Year-to-date, the SCHZ ETF saw +$1.54B in flows, compared to -$121M for BAB.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHZ or BAB?
Over the past year, SCHZ had a volatility of 3.69%, while BAB experienced 4.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHZ or BAB?
As of September 18, 2026, SCHZ holds $10.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while BAB manages $863.66 M.
What sectors do the SCHZ and BAB ETFs invest in?
SCHZ leans toward sectors like Sovereign and Industrials. Meanwhile, BAB focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the SCHZ ETF and BAB ETF?
SCHZ top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036), USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035) and USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034). BAB holds in its top three: Illinois, 5.1% 1jun2033, USD, California, 7.55% 1apr2039, USD and California, 7.6% 1nov2040, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHZ or BAB?
SCHZ holds 1448 securities with 8.86% of its assets in the top 15. BAB has 1920 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.41%.
Latest news about SCHZ & BAB
Advertisement
