Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHMvsXJHETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SCHM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.12% for XJH. SCHM is up 4.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$178M in YTD flows. XJH performs worse with 3.32% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHM and XJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHM vs XJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHM XJH | -3.65%-5.08% | +2.37%+0.71% | +4.98%+3.32% | +23.01%+19.53% | +52.28%+46.91% | +35.52%+36.21% |
| Flows | SCHM XJH | +$215M+$7M | +$236M+$7M | +$178M+$5M | +$226M+$49M | -$229M+$182M | +$1.38B+$275M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHM XJH | +15.11%+15.46% | +21.22%+20.96% | +17.75%+18.20% | +19.54%+19.80% |
| Max drawdown | SCHM XJH | -5.25%-5.76% | -15.46%-15.00% | -23.35%-24.38% | -26.40%-24.99% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHM XJH | 13d17d | 46d46d | 283d379d | 855d815d |
SCHM | XJH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.91 | $46.04 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $31.56 | $46.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.91 | $46.04 |
| 1D performance | -2.06% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $13.09 B | $350.19 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.12% |
SCHM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 452 | 346 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2011 | September 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHM and XJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHM is up 4.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XJH has returned 3.32%. That puts SCHM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHM or XJH?
Year-to-date, the SCHM ETF saw +$178M in flows, compared to +$5M for XJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHM or XJH?
Over the past year, SCHM had a volatility of 21.22%, while XJH experienced 20.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHM or XJH?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHM holds $13.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while XJH manages $350.19 M.
What sectors do the SCHM and XJH ETFs invest in?
SCHM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, XJH focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCHM ETF and XJH ETF?
SCHM top holdings include US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076. XJH holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHM or XJH?
SCHM holds 498 securities with 8.79% of its assets in the top 15. XJH has 356 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.01%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
