SCHMvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. SCHM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, MCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. SCHM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. SCHM is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$274M in YTD flows. MCDS performs worse with 15.82% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCHM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHM MCDS | -4.60%-0.29% | +2.18%+5.90% | +16.02%+15.82% | +23.10%+19.99% | +47.03%n/a | +43.77%n/a |
| Flows | SCHM MCDS | +$72M- | -$63M-$4K | +$274M-$4K | +$211M+$14K | -$8M- | +$1.01B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHM MCDS | +18.10%+12.01% | +16.72%+13.27% | +18.07%n/a | +19.78%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCHM MCDS | -7.29%-3.13% | -9.30%-7.49% | -23.35%n/a | -26.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHM MCDS | 31d16d | 46d46d | 283dn/a | 855dn/a |
Trading data
SCHM | MCDS | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.27 | $68.32 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $34.70 | $67.63 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.27 | $68.32 |
| 1D performance | +1.64% | +1.02% |
| AuM | $14.50 B | $8.11 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
SCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 495 | 185 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2011 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCHM
USA
96.33%
Other
3.67%
MCDS
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
Sectors
SCHM
Technology
20.21%
Finance
18.39%
Industrials
18.28%
Healthcare
11.01%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.31%
Other
22.8%
MCDS
Finance
20.78%
Industrials
18.07%
Technology
17.55%
Healthcare
8.96%
Other
34.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.66%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SCHM
Sandisk Corp.
5.23%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.58%
Coherent Corp.
1.43%
Ciena Corp.
1.21%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.20%
Flex Ltd.
1.03%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.63%
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
0.60%
Tapestry, Inc.
0.56%
Centene Corp.
0.55%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
0.55%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.53%
Twilio, Inc.
0.53%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.52%
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
0.51%
MCDS
Western Digital Corp.
2.94%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.62%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.60%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.35%
State Street Corp.
1.29%
Sandisk Corp.
1.26%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.18%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.15%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.13%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.13%
Dover Corp.
1.12%
Ross Stores, Inc.
1.08%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.06%
Corning, Inc.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about SCHM and MCDS
How have the SCHM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, SCHM is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 15.82%. That puts SCHM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the SCHM ETF saw +$274M in flows, compared to -$4K for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHM or MCDS?
Over the past year, SCHM had a volatility of 16.72%, while MCDS experienced 13.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHM or MCDS?
As of July 31, 2026, SCHM holds $14.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $8.11 M.
What sectors do the SCHM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
SCHM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCHM ETF and MCDS ETF?
SCHM top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Bloom Energy Corp. and Coherent Corp.. MCDS holds in its top three: Western Digital Corp., Howmet Aerospace, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHM or MCDS?
SCHM holds 496 securities with 16.66% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 185 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.19%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
