SCHMvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. SCHM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, MCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. SCHM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. SCHM is up 16.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.04B in YTD flows. MCDS performs worse with 13.2% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCHM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHM MCDS | -5.21%-5.80% | -1.60%-0.35% | +16.64%+13.20% | +18.93%+15.46% | +56.68%n/a | +43.61%n/a |
| Flows | SCHM MCDS | +$2.75B+$1M | +$2.91B+$1M | +$3.04B+$1M | +$3.01B+$1M | +$2.20B- | +$2.75B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHM MCDS | +16.05%+10.51% | +16.80%+13.18% | +18.15%n/a | +19.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCHM MCDS | -7.29%-6.90% | -9.30%-7.49% | -23.35%n/a | -26.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHM MCDS | 79d32d | 46d46d | 283dn/a | 855dn/a |
Trading data
SCHM | MCDS | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.86 | $66.01 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $34.56 | $65.59 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.86 | $66.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.87% | +0.65% |
| AuM | $17.34 B | $9.24 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
SCHM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 493 | 202 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2011 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCHM
USA
96.44%
Other
3.56%
MCDS
USA
96.81%
Other
3.19%
Sectors
SCHM
Finance
19.92%
Technology
17.63%
Industrials
17.2%
Healthcare
11.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.41%
Other
23.88%
MCDS
Finance
21.87%
Industrials
16.39%
Technology
16.05%
Healthcare
10.7%
Other
34.99%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.68%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SCHM
Sandisk Corp.
3.58%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.04%
Coherent Corp.
1.01%
Ciena Corp.
1.01%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.94%
Flex Ltd.
0.81%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.71%
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
0.64%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
0.60%
Centene Corp.
0.58%
TechnipFMC plc
0.57%
Tapestry, Inc.
0.57%
Twilio, Inc.
0.56%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.54%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.52%
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.39%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.23%
State Street Corp.
1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.17%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.15%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.11%
Dover Corp.
0.99%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.99%
Loews Corp.
0.98%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.98%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.97%
Performance Food Group Co.
0.96%
CMS Energy Corp.
0.96%
Entergy Corp.
0.96%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about SCHM and MCDS
How have the SCHM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, SCHM is up 16.64% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 13.2%. That puts SCHM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the SCHM ETF saw +$3.04B in flows, compared to +$1M for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHM or MCDS?
Over the past year, SCHM had a volatility of 16.8%, while MCDS experienced 13.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHM or MCDS?
As of September 17, 2026, SCHM holds $17.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $9.24 M.
What sectors do the SCHM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
SCHM leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCHM ETF and MCDS ETF?
SCHM top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Lumentum Holdings, Inc. and Coherent Corp.. MCDS holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. and State Street Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHM or MCDS?
SCHM holds 493 securities with 13.68% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 202 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.97%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
