Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHMvsBBMCETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. SCHM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, BBMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. SCHM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.07% for BBMC. SCHM is up 4.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$178M in YTD flows. BBMC performs worse with 3.58% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHM and BBMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHM vs BBMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHM BBMC | -3.65%-4.32% | +2.37%+0.83% | +4.98%+3.58% | +23.01%+24.11% | +52.28%+59.00% | +35.52%+34.92% |
| Flows | SCHM BBMC | +$215M-$6M | +$236M-$146M | +$178M+$31M | +$226M-$240M | -$229M-$294M | +$1.38B-$298M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHM BBMC | +15.11%+15.85% | +21.22%+21.47% | +17.75%+18.69% | +19.54%+20.65% |
| Max drawdown | SCHM BBMC | -5.25%-5.62% | -15.46%-15.74% | -23.35%-24.17% | -26.40%-30.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHM BBMC | 13d13d | 46d46d | 283d275d | 855d1045d |
SCHM | BBMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.91 | $108.97 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $31.56 | $110.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHM | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHM | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.91 | $108.97 |
| 1D performance | -2.06% | -1.37% |
| AuM | $13.09 B | $1.90 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.07% |
SCHM | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 452 | 512 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2011 | April 14, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHM and BBMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHM is up 4.98% year-to-date (YTD), while BBMC has returned 3.58%. That puts SCHM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHM or BBMC?
Year-to-date, the SCHM ETF saw +$178M in flows, compared to +$31M for BBMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHM or BBMC?
Over the past year, SCHM had a volatility of 21.22%, while BBMC experienced 21.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHM or BBMC?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHM holds $13.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBMC manages $1.90 B.
What sectors do the SCHM and BBMC ETFs invest in?
SCHM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, BBMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCHM ETF and BBMC ETF?
SCHM top holdings include US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076. BBMC holds in its top three: US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHM or BBMC?
SCHM holds 498 securities with 8.79% of its assets in the top 15. BBMC has 564 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.87%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
